Scott S. Mitchell
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Papers in
-
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 3
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions 2
-
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 4
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 2
- Co-authors
- Barbara C. M. Potts (5 shared papers)Kin S. Lam (5 shared papers)D. John Faulkner (3 shared papers)Benjamin Nicholson (2 shared papers)Frederic D. Bushman (2 shared papers)Sy Teisan (2 shared papers)Rama Rao Manam (2 shared papers)Ta‐Hsiang Chao (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Natural Products (7 papers)Tetrahedron (1 paper)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)Online Information Review (1 paper)Biochemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Scott S. Mitchell
22 papers receiving 727 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Biotechnology 266
- Pharmacology 290
- Organic Chemistry 237
- Molecular Biology 372
- Toxicology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Scott S. Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott S. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott S. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott S. Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott S. Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott S. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott S. Mitchell. The network helps show where Scott S. Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott S. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 193 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 62 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 16 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 2 |
About Scott S. Mitchell
Scott S. Mitchell is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Biotechnology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (7 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (6 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (4 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (3 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers), Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (2 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (266 citations), Pharmacology (290 citations), Organic Chemistry (237 citations), Molecular Biology (372 citations) and Toxicology (18 citations). Scott S. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Barbara C. M. Potts, Kin S. Lam, D. John Faulkner, Benjamin Nicholson, Frederic D. Bushman, Sy Teisan, Rama Rao Manam, Ta‐Hsiang Chao, Saskia Neuteboom and Gordafaried Deyanat‐Yazdi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Tetrahedron, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Online Information Review and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.