Scott Roberts

846 citations
58 papers · 418 indexed · h-index 10

Scott Roberts

54 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Scott Roberts
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Instrumentation 37
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 86
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 150
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 34
  • Applied Psychology 15
Replace Robert C. Gray with:
Robert C. Gray United States
Kathryn Atherton United Kingdom
Maximilian C. Fink Germany
Michal E. Pawlowski United States
Alan MacPherson United Kingdom
Liqi Zhu China
Catherine Holloway United Kingdom
Christopher Peters United States
James D. K. Kim South Korea
Mark Parent United States
Scott Roberts relative to Robert C. Gray United States Robert C. Gray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.5×
Robert C. Gray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Roberts. The network helps show where Scott Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Roberts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Roberts Line = papers co-authored together Scott Roberts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20171
4
Revisiting the Red Effect on Attractiveness and Sexual Receptivity
20163
5 20166
6 201647
7 201668
8 20084
9 20054
10 20056
11 20042
12 20047
13 20043
14 20046
15 20033
16 19981
17
The business of personal training
19966
18 199651
19 199242
20 199114

About Scott Roberts

Scott Roberts is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 58 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (35 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (19 papers), Advanced optical system design (13 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (8 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (7 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (4 papers), Flow Experience in Various Fields (3 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (37 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (86 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (150 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (34 citations) and Applied Psychology (15 citations). Scott Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Yanhui Mao, Marino Bonaiuto, Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, Konstantinos Vogiatzis, Stefano Pagliaro, Uberta Ganucci Cancellieri, Silvia Ariccio, George Z. Angeli, John Pazder and Bernard R. Cahill. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Asian Business & Management, Evolutionary Psychology, Healthcare and Human Kinetics eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026