Malcolm J. Smith

64 papers receiving 735 citations

Peers

Malcolm J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Instrumentation 39
  • Metals and Alloys 28
  • Mechanical Engineering 362
  • Mechanics of Materials 200
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 156
Replace Ken’ichi Nishiguchi with:
Ken’ichi Nishiguchi Japan
Juan Antonio Quiroga Spain
Reza K. Amineh United States
T. D. Dudderar United States
Joseph F. Vignola United States
James L. Fanson United States
Ole J. Løkberg Norway
James L. Blackshire United States
J. C. Estrada Mexico
Zensheu Chang United States
Malcolm J. Smith relative to Ken’ichi Nishiguchi Japan Ken’ichi Nishiguchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ken’ichi Nishiguchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm J. Smith. The network helps show where Malcolm J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010147
2 201259
3 200844
4 201044
5 201434
6 201031
7 201223
8
19th International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems (MTNS)
201022
9 199720
10 201220
11 201519
12 200619
13 201818
14 200315
15 200414
16 201412
17 199711
18 201211
19 197411
20 198510

About Malcolm J. Smith

Malcolm J. Smith is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 66 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (23 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (16 papers), Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis (12 papers), Advanced optical system design (8 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (8 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (8 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers) and Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (39 citations), Metals and Alloys (28 citations), Mechanical Engineering (362 citations), Mechanics of Materials (200 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (156 citations). Malcolm J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Neil Pegg, Liam Gannon, Yi Liu, Fred van Keulen, Yi Liu, Jean‐Pierre Véran, Glen Herriot, Jason Zheng Jiang, H Berger and Stanley G. Hutton. Their work appears in journals such as Ships and Offshore Structures, Shock and Vibration, Marine Structures, Probation Journal and Journal of Applied Mechanics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact