Scott Radcliffe
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 10%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Infectious Diseases
- Co-authors
- M. C. WalshB. T. RichertGillian E. GardinerColin HillR. Paul RossCatherine StantonMairéad DalyGerald F. Fitzgerald
- Topics
- Viral Infections and Immunology Research (2 papers)Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (1 paper)Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Animal ScienceFEMS Microbiology EcologyJournal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Scott Radcliffe
10 papers receiving 200 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Molecular Biology 111
- Food Science 91
- Animal Science and Zoology 75
- Nutrition and Dietetics 31
- Infectious Diseases 24
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Radcliffe
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Radcliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Radcliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Radcliffe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Radcliffe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Radcliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Radcliffe. The network helps show where Scott Radcliffe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Radcliffe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Radcliffe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Radcliffe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Radcliffe. Scott Radcliffe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 88 | |
| 8 | Carboxylic acids as bioregulators and gut growth promoters in non-ruminants | 42 |
| 9 | The Effects of Supplementing Weanling Pig Diets with Organic and Inorganic Acids on Growth Performance and Microbial Shedding | 9 |
| 10 | 1 |
About Scott Radcliffe
Scott Radcliffe is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Animal Science and Zoology and Gastroenterology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral Infections and Immunology Research (2 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (1 paper) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (75 citations), Food Science (91 citations) and Small Animals (22 citations). Scott Radcliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include M. C. Walsh, B. T. Richert, Gillian E. Gardiner, Colin Hill, R. Paul Ross, Catherine Stanton, Mairéad Daly, Gerald F. Fitzgerald, Brendan Lynch and Linda Giblin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, FEMS Microbiology Ecology and Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.