Scott King
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 2
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 4
- Co-authors
- Fred B. Bryant (3 shared papers)Colette M. Smart (1 shared paper)Charles Spence (3 shared papers)Carlos Velasco (2 shared papers)J C Petrie (1 shared paper)Anne-Sylvie Crisinel (1 shared paper)Eva Cyhlarova (1 shared paper)J. Mark G. Williams (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Sensory Studies (1 paper)Journal of Intergenerational Relationships (1 paper)AIDS Care (1 paper)Journal of Organizational Behavior (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Scott King
16 papers receiving 729 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Sensory Systems 148
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 37
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 292
- Applied Psychology 92
- Social Psychology 269
Countries citing papers authored by Scott King
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott King. The network helps show where Scott King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Scott King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 271 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 157 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 55 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 13 | Development and Validation of the Workplace Intergenerational Atmosphere Scale | 2010 | 3 |
| 14 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 1 |
About Scott King
Scott King is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 773 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (148 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (37 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (292 citations), Applied Psychology (92 citations) and Social Psychology (269 citations). Scott King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Fred B. Bryant, Colette M. Smart, Charles Spence, Carlos Velasco, J C Petrie, Anne-Sylvie Crisinel, Eva Cyhlarova, J. Mark G. Williams, Adele Krusche and Russell Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sensory Studies, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, AIDS Care, Journal of Organizational Behavior and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.