Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Getting the Hologenome Concept Right: an Eco-Evolutionary Framework for Hosts and Their Microbiomes
2016366 citationsKevin R. Theis, Nolwenn M. Dheilly et al.mSystemsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Scott F. Gilbert
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott F. Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott F. Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott F. Gilbert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott F. Gilbert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott F. Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott F. Gilbert. The network helps show where Scott F. Gilbert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott F. Gilbert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott F. Gilbert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott F. Gilbert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Scott F. Gilbert. Scott F. Gilbert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Feiner, Nathalie, et al.. (2024). Evolution Evolving. Princeton University Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
3.
Gilbert, Scott F.. (2023). Shells, Gills, and Gonads. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 53(3). 221–241.
4.
Gilbert, Scott F.. (2019). Towards A Developmental Biology Of Holobionts. Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College). 13.2 indexed citations
5.
Gilbert, Scott F., Eugene Rosenberg, & Ilana Zilber‐Rosenberg. (2018). The Holobiont With Its Hologenome Is A Level Of Selection In Evolution. Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College). 305.12 indexed citations
6.
Theis, Kevin R., Nolwenn M. Dheilly, Jonathan L. Klassen, et al.. (2016). Getting the Hologenome Concept Right: an Eco-Evolutionary Framework for Hosts and Their Microbiomes. mSystems. 1(2).366 indexed citations breakdown →
Balk, Ethan M., Gowri Raman, Mei Chung, et al.. (2006). Comparative effectiveness of management strategies for renal artery stenosis. Annals of Internal Medicine.10 indexed citations
Haraway, Donna & Scott F. Gilbert. (2004). Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields: Metaphors That Shape Embryos. Medical Entomology and Zoology.54 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.