Scott E. Regenbogen

9.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
123 papers, 6.0k citations indexed

About

Scott E. Regenbogen is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott E. Regenbogen has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 6.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Surgery, 50 papers in Oncology and 45 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Scott E. Regenbogen's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (43 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (39 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (20 papers). Scott E. Regenbogen is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (43 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (39 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (20 papers). Scott E. Regenbogen collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Switzerland. Scott E. Regenbogen's co-authors include Atul A. Gawande, Stuart R. Lipsitz, William R. Berry, Thomas G. Weiser, Alex B. Haynes, Caprice C. Greenberg, Michael J. Zinner, Samantha Hendren, David M. Studdert and Karin M. Hardiman and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, JAMA and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Scott E. Regenbogen

115 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data

2008 1.7k citations Thomas G. Weiser, Scott E. Regenbogen et al. The Lancet profile →
Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients

2007 632 citations Caprice C. Greenberg, Scott E. Regenbogen et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Scott E. Regenbogen United States	38	2.9k	2.5k	1.1k	1.1k	894	123	6.0k
Amir A. Ghaferi United States	38	3.6k 1.2×	2.7k 1.1×	445 0.4×	1.2k 1.1×	1.1k 1.2×	156	6.9k
Selwyn O. Rogers United States	32	1.6k 0.6×	1.1k 0.5×	789 0.7×	661 0.6×	760 0.9×	109	4.8k
Matthew M. Hutter United States	37	3.6k 1.2×	1.1k 0.5×	448 0.4×	691 0.6×	815 0.9×	104	5.7k
Rachel R. Kelz United States	42	4.3k 1.5×	1.6k 0.7×	490 0.5×	1.4k 1.3×	1.1k 1.3×	346	8.1k
Samuel R.G. Finlayson United States	36	2.7k 0.9×	919 0.4×	427 0.4×	1.4k 1.3×	446 0.5×	114	5.1k
Lillian S. Kao United States	45	4.3k 1.5×	842 0.3×	351 0.3×	915 0.9×	1.3k 1.4×	263	6.8k
Nancy J. O. Birkmeyer United States	45	5.5k 1.9×	2.3k 1.0×	249 0.2×	1.1k 1.1×	532 0.6×	81	8.8k
Simon Paterson‐Brown United Kingdom	37	2.7k 0.9×	996 0.4×	935 0.9×	492 0.5×	954 1.1×	134	5.0k
Bruce L. Hall United States	52	7.0k 2.4×	4.5k 1.8×	434 0.4×	2.7k 2.5×	1.3k 1.5×	184	10.9k
Peter Cram United States	45	3.3k 1.1×	1.4k 0.6×	373 0.3×	501 0.5×	1.1k 1.2×	224	7.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Scott E. Regenbogen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott E. Regenbogen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott E. Regenbogen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott E. Regenbogen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott E. Regenbogen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott E. Regenbogen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott E. Regenbogen. The network helps show where Scott E. Regenbogen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott E. Regenbogen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott E. Regenbogen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott E. Regenbogen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott E. Regenbogen. Scott E. Regenbogen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gamboa, Adriana C., Scott E. Regenbogen, Samantha Hendren, et al.. (2025). Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Does Not Improve Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Resection for Upper Rectal Cancer: A US Rectal Cancer Consortium Analysis. The American Surgeon. 92(2). 457–466.

Moazzam, Zorays, Alexander T. Hawkins, Scott E. Regenbogen, et al.. (2025). Association of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) with textbook outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Surgery. 180. 109062–109062. 2 indexed citations

Kwon, Richard S., George Philips, Scott E. Regenbogen, et al.. (2024). Comparison of lumen-apposing metal stents versus endoscopic balloon dilation for the management of benign colorectal anastomotic strictures. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 100(1). 136–139.e3.

Anto, Vincent P., Katherine M. Reitz, Scott E. Regenbogen, et al.. (2024). Prophylactic defunctioning stomas improve clinical outcomes of anastomotic leak following rectal cancer resections: An analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 39(1). 39–39. 2 indexed citations

Muldoon, Roberta L., Kevin Zhang, Fei Ye, et al.. (2024). Comparison of outcomes of abdominoperineal resection vs low anterior resection in very-low rectal cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 28(9). 1450–1455. 1 indexed citations

Gamboa, Adriana C., Samantha Hendren, Scott E. Regenbogen, et al.. (2023). Association of transanal minimally invasive surgical approach with oncologic outcomes over conventional transanal excision for early-stage rectal cancer: An analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 41(4_suppl). 145–145. 1 indexed citations

Bauer, Philip S., Adriana C. Gamboa, Ebunoluwa Otegbeye, et al.. (2023). Short‐course radiation with consolidation chemotherapy does not increase operative morbidity compared to long‐course chemoradiation: A retrospective study of the US rectal cancer consortium. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 129(2). 254–263. 4 indexed citations

Vitous, C. Ann, et al.. (2021). Colorectal surgery patient perspectives on healthcare during the CoVID-19 pandemic. The American Journal of Surgery. 222(4). 759–765. 2 indexed citations

Syrjamaki, John, et al.. (2020). Effect of statewide reduction in extended care facility use after joint replacement on hospital readmission. Surgery. 169(2). 341–346. 3 indexed citations

10.

Nikolian, Vahagn C., Neil Kamdar, Scott E. Regenbogen, et al.. (2017). Anastomotic leak after colorectal resection: A population-based study of risk factors and hospital variation. Surgery. 161(6). 1619–1627. 96 indexed citations

11.

Cleary, Robert K., Andrew J. Mullard, Jane Ferraro, & Scott E. Regenbogen. (2017). The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 32(3). 1515–1524. 60 indexed citations

12.

Ibrahim, Andrew M., Scott E. Regenbogen, Jyothi R. Thumma, & Justin B. Dimick. (2017). Emergency Surgery for Medicare Beneficiaries Admitted to Critical Access Hospitals. Annals of Surgery. 267(3). 473–477. 21 indexed citations

13.

Regenbogen, Scott E., et al.. (2016). Population-based Assessment of Intraoperative Fluid Administration Practices Across Three Surgical Specialties. Annals of Surgery. 265(5). 930–940. 18 indexed citations

14.

Veenstra, Christine M., Scott E. Regenbogen, Sarah T. Hawley, et al.. (2014). A Composite Measure of Personal Financial Burden Among Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer. Medical Care. 52(11). 957–962. 54 indexed citations

15.

Regenbogen, Scott E., et al.. (2010). A comparative analysis of incident reporting lag times in academic medical centres in Japan and the USA. BMJ Quality & Safety. 19(6). e10–e10. 3 indexed citations

16.

Regenbogen, Scott E., Liliana Bordeianou, Matthew M. Hutter, & Atul A. Gawande. (2010). The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection. Surgery. 148(3). 559–566. 67 indexed citations

17.

Bickler, Stephen W., David A. Spiegel, Thomas G. Weiser, et al.. (2008). An estimation of the global volume of surgery : a modelling strategy based on available data. Commentary. The Lancet. 372(9633). 15 indexed citations

18.

Greenberg, Caprice C., et al.. (2007). The Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 46(2). 395–395. 54 indexed citations

19.

Hirose, Masahiro, Scott E. Regenbogen, Stuart R. Lipsitz, et al.. (2007). Lag time in an incident reporting system at a university hospital in Japan. BMJ Quality & Safety. 16(2). 101–104. 26 indexed citations

20.

Regenbogen, Scott E., Caprice C. Greenberg, David M. Studdert, et al.. (2007). Patterns of Technical Error Among Surgical Malpractice Claims. Annals of Surgery. 246(5). 705–711. 158 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact