Peter Cram

217 papers receiving 7.5k citations

Hit Papers

Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study 2021 · 166 citations
1662012202620162021200400600

Peers

Peter Cram
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Emergency Medicine 1.1k
  • Family Practice 170
  • Surgery 3.3k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.4k
  • General Health Professions 1.4k
Replace C. David Naylor with:
C. David Naylor Canada
Jeff Whittle United States
Carol M. Ashton United States
Rosanna M. Coffey United States
David J. Malenka United States
Cynthia Fraser United Kingdom
Elliott S. Fisher United States
Andrew D. Auerbach United States
Thomas McGinn United States
John E. Wennberg United States
Peter Cram relative to C. David Naylor Canada C. David Naylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
C. David Naylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Cram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Cram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cram. The network helps show where Peter Cram may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Cram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Cram Line = papers co-authored together Peter Cram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 202310
3 202213
4 20225
5 20222
6 20222
7 20228
8 20210
9 2021107
10 20214
11 20202
12 20205
13 20198
14 201725
15 201741
16 201720
17 20161
18 201611
19
General hospitals, specialty hospitals and financially vulnerable patients.
20099
20 200525

About Peter Cram

Peter Cram is a scholar working on Family Practice, Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 224 papers that have together received 7.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (52 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (28 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (27 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (27 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (26 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (23 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (22 papers) and Bone health and osteoporosis research (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (1.1k citations), Family Practice (170 citations), Surgery (3.3k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.4k citations) and General Health Professions (1.4k citations). Peter Cram has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary Vaughan‐Sarrazin, Gary E. Rosenthal, Xin Lü, Jasvinder A. Singh, Brian R. Wolf, Xin Lu, Yue Li, Stephen L. Kates, John J. Callaghan and A. Mark Fendrick. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, JAMA, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026