Scott D. Wright

59 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Scott D. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 35
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 309
  • Clinical Psychology 425
  • Environmental Chemistry 173
  • Parasitology 99
Replace Melissa Gladstone with:
Melissa Gladstone United Kingdom
A. Blair Irvine United States
James Jones United States
S. M. Grantham‐McGregor Jamaica
Margaret Brown United States
C. G. N. Mascie‐Taylor United Kingdom
Lisa Johnson United States
William H. James United Kingdom
J. Josh Snodgrass United States
Cindy L. Adams Canada
Scott D. Wright relative to Melissa Gladstone United Kingdom Melissa Gladstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
Melissa Gladstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott D. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott D. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott D. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott D. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott D. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott D. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott D. Wright. The network helps show where Scott D. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott D. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott D. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Scott D. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998200
2 1985163
3 1996131
4 1987129
5 200255
6 200045
7 198543
8 201741
9 198740
10 199038
11 199136
12 200334
13 201631
14 201131
15 201531
16 201430
17 201330
18 198927
19 198727
20 199524

About Scott D. Wright

Scott D. Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Education and Molecular Biology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (9 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Marine animal studies overview (4 papers), Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (35 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (309 citations), Clinical Psychology (425 citations), Environmental Chemistry (173 citations) and Parasitology (99 citations). Scott D. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dale A. Lund, Cheryl Wright, Michael S. Caserta, Clara C. Pratt, Vicki L. Schmall, Gregory D. Bossart, Brenda Roberts, Daniel G. Baden, Ruth Y. Ewing and Ed Diener. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wildlife Diseases, The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, Marine Mammal Science, Journal of Gerontological Social Work and Journal of Applied Gerontology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact