Scott Burk

2.8k citations
25 papers · 2.2k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 18

Scott Burk

25 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Functional comparisons between isoforms of the sarcoplasm...5571992202620032014100200300400500

Peers

Scott Burk
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Ophthalmology 1.0k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 870
  • Physiology 88
  • Sensory Systems 94
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
Replace Bret A. Hughes with:
Bret A. Hughes United States
B’Ann T. Gabelt United States
Dmitry Ivanov United States
Roxana A. Radu United States
Alessandro Iannaccone United States
Patricia Crisanti France
Christian P. Hamel France
Marko Hawlina Slovenia
Atsuhiro Kanda Japan
Carolyn M. Radeke United States
Scott Burk relative to Bret A. Hughes United States Bret A. Hughes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Bret A. Hughes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Burk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Burk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Burk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Burk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Burk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Burk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Burk. The network helps show where Scott Burk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Burk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Burk Line = papers co-authored together Scott Burk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20202
2 200725
3 200495
4 200336
5 200385
6 200221
7 2001237
8 2001103
9 2000247
10 1999106
11 199946
12 199931
13 19982
14 199750
15 19954
16 199419
17
Subacute care. Defining the challenge.
19941
18 1993139
19
Functional comparisons between isoforms of the sarcoplasmic or endoplasmic reticulum family of calcium pumps.breakdown →
1992557
20 1989347

About Scott Burk

Scott Burk is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (8 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.0k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (870 citations), Physiology (88 citations), Sensory Systems (94 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.1k citations). Scott Burk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gary E. Shull, Jonathan Lytton, David H. MacLennan, Andrea P. Da Mata, Michael E. Snyder, Marisa M. Westlin, Robert E. Foster, Robert H. Rosa, Robert H. Osher and Christopher D. Riemann. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Retina and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026