Sarah Pedersen
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Communication top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Co-authors
- Deborah LuptonGareth ThomasCaroline MacafeeJanet SmithsonSimon BurnettRobert SmithCarlos MartinGraeme Baxter
- Topics
- Gender, Feminism, and Media (14 papers)Social Media and Politics (13 papers)Irish and British Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Sarah Pedersen
43 papers receiving 854 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Sociology and Political Science 399
- Gender Studies 219
- Communication 195
- General Health Professions 189
- Education 180
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Pedersen
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Pedersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Pedersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Pedersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Pedersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Pedersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Pedersen. The network helps show where Sarah Pedersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Pedersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Pedersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Pedersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Pedersen. Sarah Pedersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 182 | |
| 11 | 150 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 78 | |
| 15 | Motivations for police blogging and how fear of being ‘outed’ can force a blogger to cease. | 1 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | A Comparison of the Blogging Practices of UK and US Bloggers | 1 |
| 18 | The Practices and Popularity of British Bloggers | 3 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Where, when, why : Academic authorship in the UK | 2 |
About Sarah Pedersen
Sarah Pedersen is a scholar working on Communication, Gender Studies and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 48 papers that have together received 903 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (14 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers) and Irish and British Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (195 citations), Gender Studies (219 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (53 citations). Sarah Pedersen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Lupton, Gareth Thomas, Caroline Macafee, Janet Smithson, Simon Burnett, Robert Smith, Robert Smith, Carlos Martin, Graeme Baxter and David Corney. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication and Maternal and Child Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.