Maternal and Child Nutrition

2.0k papers and 46.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Maternal and Child Nutrition in the last decades have received a total of 46.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Maternal and Child Nutrition usually cover Nutrition and Dietetics (1.2k papers), Epidemiology (713 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (606 papers) specifically the topics of Child Nutrition and Water Access (1.1k papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (711 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (559 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Maternal and Child Nutrition are Kathryn G. Dewey, Mercedes de Onís, Francesco Branca, Amy Brown, Seth Adu‐Afarwuah, Rafael Pérez‐Escamilla, Khadija Begum, Víctor M. Aguayo, Michael J. Dibley and Fiona Dykes.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Maternal and Child Nutrition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Maternal and Child Nutrition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Maternal and Child Nutrition.

Countries where authors publish in Maternal and Child Nutrition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Maternal and Child Nutrition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Maternal and Child Nutrition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maternal and Child Nutrition more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025