Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measuring socio-economic position for epidemiological studies in low- and middle-income countries: a methods of measurement in epidemiology paper
This map shows the geographic impact of David Gordon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gordon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gordon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gordon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gordon. The network helps show where David Gordon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Gordon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Gordon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Gordon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Gordon. David Gordon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Edwards, Rosalind, et al.. (2014). Poverty in the UK: Advancing paradata analysis and open access. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol).1 indexed citations
10.
Gordon, David, et al.. (2013). Building Community Partnerships with Adults with Disabilities: A Case Study Using Narrative Literacy as a Conduit for Shared Learning. 1(3). 8–8.1 indexed citations
11.
Gordon, David. (2011). The Ideological Profile of Harvard University Press: Categorizing 494 Books Published 2000-2010. Econ journal watch. 8(1). 76–95.1 indexed citations
12.
Pantazis, Christina, David Gordon, & Ruth Levitas. (2006). Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain: The Millennium Survey. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).128 indexed citations
13.
Gordon, David, et al.. (2004). Flexible and Secure: Adaptability and the Employment Relationship. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 48–76.2 indexed citations
14.
Gordon, David. (2003). Iraq, war and morality. Economic and political weekly. 1117–1120.1 indexed citations
15.
Gordon, David & Peter Townsend. (2000). Breadline Europe: The Measurement of Poverty. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).118 indexed citations
Shaw, Mary, Daniel Dorling, David Gordon, & George Davey Smith. (1999). The widening gap. Bristol University Press eBooks.124 indexed citations
18.
Gordon, David. (1999). Inequalities in health : the evidence : the evidence presented to the independent inquiry into inequalities in health, chaired by Sir Donald Acheson.21 indexed citations
19.
Gibbons, Jane, Bernard Gallagher, Caroline Bell, & David Gordon. (1995). Development after physical abuse in early childhood a follow-up study of children on protection registers. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.