Sarah J. Wallace

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
77 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Sarah J. Wallace is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah J. Wallace has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 35 papers in Rehabilitation and 24 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Sarah J. Wallace's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (42 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (35 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (21 papers). Sarah J. Wallace is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (42 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (35 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (21 papers). Sarah J. Wallace collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Sarah J. Wallace's co-authors include Tanya Rose, Linda Worrall, Guylaine Le Dorze, Hannah Kuper, Tess Bright, Nina Simmons‐Mackie, Jytte Isaksen, Madeline Cruice, Anthony Pak‐Hin Kong and Nerina Scarinci and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and The Gerontologist.

In The Last Decade

Sarah J. Wallace

67 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A Systematic Review of Access to Rehabilitation for People with Disabilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

2018 207 citations Sarah J. Wallace et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah J. Wallace Australia	19	640	446	339	287	183	77	1.3k
Tanya Rose Australia	21	856 1.3×	462 1.0×	431 1.3×	292 1.0×	148 0.8×	67	1.4k
Maria Huijbregts Canada	21	430 0.7×	766 1.7×	315 0.9×	552 1.9×	274 1.5×	35	1.6k
Deborah Hersh Australia	25	1.1k 1.7×	617 1.4×	746 2.2×	360 1.3×	330 1.8×	119	2.0k
Shirley Thomas United Kingdom	22	350 0.5×	685 1.5×	301 0.9×	466 1.6×	320 1.7×	80	1.6k
Hanne Kaae Kristensen Denmark	26	611 1.0×	239 0.5×	325 1.0×	639 2.2×	107 0.6×	98	2.1k
Melissa Selb Switzerland	22	379 0.6×	173 0.4×	120 0.4×	839 2.9×	232 1.3×	63	1.5k
Emma Finch Australia	17	304 0.5×	156 0.3×	247 0.7×	135 0.5×	187 1.0×	84	857
Felicity Bright New Zealand	15	142 0.2×	283 0.6×	307 0.9×	186 0.6×	149 0.8×	36	844
Birgitta Bernspång Sweden	24	186 0.3×	451 1.0×	255 0.8×	677 2.4×	249 1.4×	47	1.5k
Michael McCue United States	22	195 0.3×	229 0.5×	439 1.3×	300 1.0×	219 1.2×	68	1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah J. Wallace

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah J. Wallace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah J. Wallace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah J. Wallace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah J. Wallace

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah J. Wallace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah J. Wallace. The network helps show where Sarah J. Wallace may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah J. Wallace

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah J. Wallace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah J. Wallace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah J. Wallace. Sarah J. Wallace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Shrubsole, Kirstine, et al.. (2025). Communication partner training for aged‐care workers: A scoping review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 60(2). e70016–e70016. 2 indexed citations

Palmer, Victoria, et al.. (2025). Priorities for post-stroke aphasia service development: Prioritisation phase of an experience-based co-design study. Clinical Rehabilitation. 39(3). 353–365.

Shrubsole, Kirstine, Sarah J. Wallace, Jytte Isaksen, David A. Copland, & Emma Power. (2025). Communication partner training (CPT) in Australian post-stroke aphasia services: a national survey investigating implementation barriers, facilitators and training needs. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 33(1). 16–28.

Shrubsole, Kirstine, Kris Rogers, Sarah J. Wallace, et al.. (2025). Improving communication partner training of familiar partners of people with aphasia: results of a pilot stepped wedge implementation trial and embedded process evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation. 48(5). 1314–1334. 1 indexed citations

Wallace, Sarah J., David A. Copland, Dominique A. Cadilhac, et al.. (2025). Quality and Outcomes of Acute Stroke Care for People With and Without Aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 107(2). 188–197.

Volkmer, Anna, David A. Copland, Maya L. Henry, et al.. (2024). COS-PPA: protocol to develop a core outcome set for primary progressive aphasia. BMJ Open. 14(5). e078714–e078714. 3 indexed citations

Isaksen, Jytte, et al.. (2024). What does it mean to be aphasia aware? An international survey of stakeholder perspectives and experiences of aphasia awareness. Aphasiology. 38(12). 1916–1939. 2 indexed citations

Cadilhac, Dominique A., Joosup Kim, Carolyn Unsworth, et al.. (2024). ‘A Meaningful Difference, but Not Ultimately the Difference I Would Want’: A Mixed‐Methods Approach to Explore and Benchmark Clinically Meaningful Changes in Aphasia Recovery. Health Expectations. 27(4). e14169–e14169. 3 indexed citations

Wallace, Sarah J., Joosup Kim, Steven Faux, et al.. (2023). Is communication key in stroke rehabilitation and recovery? National linked stroke data study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 31(4). 325–335. 3 indexed citations

10.

Wallace, Sarah J., Michelle C. Attard, Caroline Baker, et al.. (2023). Best Practice in Post-Stroke Aphasia Services According to People with Lived Experience. A Modified Nominal Group Technique Study. Aphasiology. 38(7). 1157–1179. 8 indexed citations

11.

Brogan, Emily, Joosup Kim, Rohan Grimley, et al.. (2023). The Excess Costs of Hospitalization for Acute Stroke in People With Communication Impairment: A Stroke123 Data Linkage Substudy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 104(6). 942–949. 7 indexed citations

12.

Brogan, Emily, Kirstine Shrubsole, Monique F. Kilkenny, et al.. (2023). An updated systematic review of stroke clinical practice guidelines to inform aphasia management. International Journal of Stroke. 18(9). 1029–1039. 15 indexed citations

13.

Breitenstein, Caterina, Katerina Hilari, Miranda L. Rose, et al.. (2022). Operationalising treatment success in aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology. 37(11). 1693–1732. 17 indexed citations

14.

Thayabaranathan, Tharshanah, Caroline Baker, Nadine E. Andrew, et al.. (2022). Exploring dimensions of quality-of-life in survivors of stroke with communication disabilities – a brief report. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 30(6). 603–609. 6 indexed citations

15.

Wallace, Sarah J., et al.. (2021). Core Outcome Set Use in Poststroke Aphasia Treatment Research: Examining Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation Using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 64(10). 3969–3982. 7 indexed citations

16.

Palmer, Victoria, et al.. (2021). Using experience-based codesign to coproduce aphasia rehabilitation services: study protocol. BMJ Open. 11(11). e047398–e047398. 11 indexed citations

17.

Isaksen, Jytte, et al.. (2020). Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers. Aphasiology. 36(4). 385–400. 48 indexed citations

18.

Wallace, Sarah J., et al.. (2020). Many ways of measuring: a scoping review of measurement instruments for use with people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 36(4). 401–466. 22 indexed citations

19.

Wallace, Sarah J., Linda Worrall, Tanya Rose, & Guylaine Le Dorze. (2017). Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: a comparison of stakeholder perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation. 41(5). 564–573. 21 indexed citations

20.

Wallace, Sarah J., Linda Worrall, Tanya Rose, et al.. (2016). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation. 39(14). 1364–1379. 166 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact