Shirley Thomas

2.6k citations
80 papers · 1.6k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Shirley Thomas

72 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Shirley Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Rehabilitation 685
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 466
  • Health 170
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 350
  • Occupational Therapy 72
Replace Ian Kneebone with:
Ian Kneebone Australia
Sharon K. Ostwald United States
Marieke Van Puymbroeck United States
Kuei‐Min Chen Taiwan
Elisa Aguirre United Kingdom
Clive Skilbeck Australia
Angelle M. Sander United States
Mitchell Rosenthal United States
Ivan Hideyo Okamoto Brazil
Ruud J. Bosscher Netherlands
Shirley Thomas relative to Ian Kneebone Australia Ian Kneebone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Ian Kneebone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Shirley Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shirley Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shirley Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shirley Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shirley Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shirley Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shirley Thomas. The network helps show where Shirley Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shirley Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Shirley Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Shirley Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009218
2 2012104
3 202095
4
Factors influencing behavioral intention regarding prostate cancer screening among older African-American men.
200675
5 200671
6 200867
7 200664
8 200663
9 200847
10 201941
11 201641
12 202139
13 201638
14 201538
15 201632
16 201228
17 200928
18 201126
19 201725
20 201924

About Shirley Thomas

Shirley Thomas is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (47 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (30 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (16 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (12 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (10 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (685 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (466 citations), Health (170 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (350 citations) and Occupational Therapy (72 citations). Shirley Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nadina B. Lincoln, Shaista Malik, Phoenix K. H. Mo, Holly Blake, Marion Walker, Nigel Hunt, Eirini Kontou, Jamie A. B. Macniven, Sarah Northcott and Katerina Hilari. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Rehabilitation, BMJ Open, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Aphasiology and Disability and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact