Sarah Hooper
About
In The Last Decade
Sarah Hooper
10 papers receiving 643 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Physiology 472
- Molecular Biology 436
- Biomedical Engineering 101
- Aging 86
- Plant Science 75
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Hooper
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Hooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Hooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Hooper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Hooper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Hooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Hooper. The network helps show where Sarah Hooper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Hooper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Hooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Hooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Hooper. Sarah Hooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 96 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | Cut out the annotator, keep the cutout: better segmentation with weak supervision | 3 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 175 | |
| 11 | 345 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.