Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features
2016680 citationsKun‐Hsing Yu, Ce Zhang et al.Nature Communicationsprofile →
Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Ré
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Ré's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Ré with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Ré more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Ré. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Ré. The network helps show where Christopher Ré may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Ré
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Ré.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Ré based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Ré. Christopher Ré is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Goel, Karan, Albert Gu, Yixuan Li, & Christopher Ré. (2021). Model Patching: Closing the Subgroup Performance Gap with Data Augmentation. arXiv (Cornell University).3 indexed citations
3.
Chen, Beidi, et al.. (2021). Scatterbrain: Unifying Sparse and Low-rank Attention. neural information processing systems. 34.14 indexed citations
Chami, Ines, et al.. (2020). From Trees to Continuous Embeddings and Back: Hyperbolic Hierarchical Clustering.. arXiv (Cornell University). 33. 15065–15076.1 indexed citations
Ratner, Alexander, Braden Hancock, & Christopher Ré. (2019). The Role of Massively Multi-Task and Weak Supervision in Software 2.0.. Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research.10 indexed citations
Ratner, Alexander, Stephen H. Bach, Henry R. Ehrenberg, et al.. (2017). Snorkel: A System for Lightweight Extraction.. Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research.2 indexed citations
16.
Yu, Kun‐Hsing, Ce Zhang, Gerald J. Berry, et al.. (2016). Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features. Nature Communications. 7(1). 12474–12474.680 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Ré, Christopher, et al.. (2014). Feature Engineering for Knowledge Base Construction.. arXiv (Cornell University). 37. 26–40.21 indexed citations
Cafarella, Michael, et al.. (2013). Ringtail: Feature Selection For Easier Nowcasting.. 49–54.7 indexed citations
20.
Zhang, Ce, et al.. (2013). Understanding Tables in Context Using Standard NLP Toolkits. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 658–664.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.