Sarah Hollitt

434 total citations
9 papers, 332 citations indexed

About

Sarah Hollitt is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Hollitt has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 332 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah Hollitt's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). Sarah Hollitt is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). Sarah Hollitt collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Netherlands. Sarah Hollitt's co-authors include Marika Tiggemann, Eva Kemps, Jennifer S. Mills, Elke Smeets, Anne Roefs, Anita Jansen, Ivanka Prichard, Janet Polivy, C. Peter Herman and W. A. Sparrow and has published in prestigious journals such as Health Psychology, Physiology & Behavior and Appetite.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Hollitt

9 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sarah Hollitt Australia	7	233	112	88	82	57	9	332
Silvia Moreno Spain	8	321 1.4×	139 1.2×	36 0.4×	71 0.9×	33 0.6×	12	392
Tara L. Williams United States	7	402 1.7×	171 1.5×	51 0.6×	82 1.0×	62 1.1×	10	514
Ghislaine Schyns Netherlands	10	218 0.9×	102 0.9×	52 0.6×	75 0.9×	67 1.2×	16	309
Anja Lender Austria	9	161 0.7×	70 0.6×	104 1.2×	141 1.7×	82 1.4×	12	375
Janneke C.A.H. Giesen Netherlands	10	240 1.0×	236 2.1×	51 0.6×	152 1.9×	45 0.8×	13	482
Mike Keesman Netherlands	10	200 0.9×	67 0.6×	87 1.0×	140 1.7×	54 0.9×	15	426
Sarah E. Polk Germany	7	131 0.6×	57 0.5×	42 0.5×	53 0.6×	40 0.7×	16	251
Mari Carmen Fernández Spain	7	231 1.0×	111 1.0×	31 0.4×	56 0.7×	20 0.4×	10	372
Oh‐Ryeong Ha United States	10	95 0.4×	110 1.0×	33 0.4×	67 0.8×	60 1.1×	16	279
Claudio Georgii Austria	9	225 1.0×	57 0.5×	63 0.7×	62 0.8×	61 1.1×	12	303

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Hollitt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Hollitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Hollitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Hollitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Hollitt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Hollitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Hollitt. The network helps show where Sarah Hollitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Hollitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Hollitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Hollitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Hollitt. Sarah Hollitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Kemps, Eva, C. Peter Herman, Sarah Hollitt, et al.. (2016). Contextual cue exposure effects on food intake in restrained eaters. Physiology & Behavior. 167. 71–75. 13 indexed citations

Kemps, Eva, C. Peter Herman, Sarah Hollitt, et al.. (2016). The role of expectations in the effect of food cue exposure on intake. Appetite. 103. 259–264. 15 indexed citations

Kemps, Eva, Marika Tiggemann, & Sarah Hollitt. (2015). Longevity of attentional bias modification effects for food cues in overweight and obese individuals. Psychology and Health. 31(1). 115–129. 21 indexed citations

Mills, Jennifer S., et al.. (2014). “That camera adds ten pounds!:” Women's reactions to visual weight-related feedback and the role of trait body checking. Body Image. 11(4). 516–526. 3 indexed citations

Kemps, Eva, Marika Tiggemann, & Sarah Hollitt. (2014). Biased attentional processing of food cues and modification in obese individuals.. Health Psychology. 33(11). 1391–1401. 82 indexed citations

Kemps, Eva, Marika Tiggemann, & Sarah Hollitt. (2014). Exposure to television food advertising primes food-related cognitions and triggers motivation to eat. Psychology and Health. 29(10). 1192–1205. 44 indexed citations

Smeets, Elke, Marika Tiggemann, Eva Kemps, et al.. (2009). Body checking induces an attentional bias for body‐related cues. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 44(1). 50–57. 47 indexed citations

Hollitt, Sarah, Eva Kemps, Marika Tiggemann, Elke Smeets, & Jennifer S. Mills. (2009). Components of attentional bias for food cues among restrained eaters. Appetite. 54(2). 309–313. 101 indexed citations

Sparrow, W. A., Alison J. Shinkfield, Ross H. Day, Sarah Hollitt, & Damien Jolley. (2002). Visual Perception of Movement Kinematics and the Acquisition of “Action Prototypes”. Motor Control. 6(2). 146–165. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact