Sarah Hartley

1.4k total citations
43 papers, 821 citations indexed

About

Sarah Hartley is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Hartley has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 821 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Molecular Biology, 15 papers in Plant Science and 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Sarah Hartley's work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (19 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (13 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (8 papers). Sarah Hartley is often cited by papers focused on CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (19 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (13 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (8 papers). Sarah Hartley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Uganda. Sarah Hartley's co-authors include Carmen McLeod, Warren Pearce, Brigitte Nerlich, Richard Helliwell, Rusi Jaspal, Bárbara Ribeiro, Mario Pansera, Fern Wickson, Karin Jongsma and Josephine Johnston and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Hartley

40 papers receiving 786 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Hartley United Kingdom 18 326 218 152 141 99 43 821
Ellen Goddard Canada 22 137 0.4× 493 2.3× 185 1.2× 181 1.3× 42 0.4× 113 1.8k
Brandon R. McFadden United States 19 171 0.5× 490 2.2× 179 1.2× 132 0.9× 51 0.5× 70 1.2k
Jason Delborne United States 19 248 0.8× 157 0.7× 63 0.4× 188 1.3× 25 0.3× 43 698
Montserrat Costa‐Font United Kingdom 13 125 0.4× 582 2.7× 175 1.2× 162 1.1× 47 0.5× 45 1.1k
Themistoklis Altintzoglou Norway 20 149 0.5× 140 0.6× 170 1.1× 99 0.7× 17 0.2× 42 1000
Mary Brennan United Kingdom 19 83 0.3× 354 1.6× 176 1.2× 503 3.6× 30 0.3× 57 1.5k
Ping Qing China 19 122 0.4× 223 1.0× 41 0.3× 140 1.0× 57 0.6× 70 1.1k
Bart Gremmen Netherlands 17 79 0.2× 180 0.8× 83 0.5× 121 0.9× 16 0.2× 56 902
Sharron Kuznesof United Kingdom 24 204 0.6× 423 1.9× 536 3.5× 320 2.3× 20 0.2× 55 2.0k
Matthias Kaiser Norway 19 149 0.5× 217 1.0× 60 0.4× 202 1.4× 18 0.2× 59 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Hartley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Hartley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Hartley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Hartley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Hartley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Hartley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Hartley. The network helps show where Sarah Hartley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Hartley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Hartley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Hartley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Hartley. Sarah Hartley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Hartley, Sarah & R. Smith. (2024). Anticipatory stakeholder engagement provides insights for gene drive in invasive species through the case of gene drive grey squirrels. Environmental Science & Policy. 162. 103939–103939.
3.
Hartley, Sarah, et al.. (2024). Talking About Gene Drive in Uganda: The Need for Science Communication to Underpin Engagement. Science Communication. 46(4). 431–457. 2 indexed citations
5.
Hartley, Sarah, et al.. (2023). The Circular Economy in European Union Policy: Explaining an idea's success through policy learning. Environmental Policy and Governance. 34(4). 363–374. 4 indexed citations
6.
Hartley, Sarah, Adam Kokotovich, Yann Devos, & John Mumford. (2023). Engagement on risk assessment for gene drive mosquitoes by EFSA and Target Malaria. Environmental Science & Policy. 142. 183–193. 6 indexed citations
7.
Russell, A. Wendy, et al.. (2022). Opening up, closing down, or leaving ajar? How applications are used in engaging with publics about gene drive. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 9(2). 151–172. 8 indexed citations
8.
Pansera, Mario, et al.. (2022). Understanding the EU's circular economy policies through futures of circularity. Journal of Cleaner Production. 385. 135723–135723. 46 indexed citations
9.
Hartley, Sarah, R. Smith, Adam Kokotovich, et al.. (2021). Ugandan stakeholder hopes and concerns about gene drive mosquitoes for malaria control: new directions for gene drive risk governance. Malaria Journal. 20(1). 149–149. 22 indexed citations
10.
Smith, R., et al.. (2021). Knowing when to talk? Plant genome editing as a site for pre-engagement institutional reflexivity. Public Understanding of Science. 30(6). 740–758. 15 indexed citations
11.
Hartley, Sarah, Delphine Thizy, Mamadou B. Coulibaly, et al.. (2019). Knowledge engagement in gene drive research for malaria control. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 13(4). e0007233–e0007233. 41 indexed citations
12.
Thizy, Delphine, Claudia Emerson, Sarah Hartley, et al.. (2019). Guidance on stakeholder engagement practices to inform the development of area-wide vector control methods. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 13(4). e0007286–e0007286. 45 indexed citations
13.
Hartley, Sarah, et al.. (2018). Science and the politics of openness : Here be monsters. Manchester University Press eBooks. 17 indexed citations
14.
Ribeiro, Bárbara, Sarah Hartley, Brigitte Nerlich, & Rusi Jaspal. (2018). Media coverage of the Zika crisis in Brazil: The construction of a ‘war’ frame that masked social and gender inequalities. Social Science & Medicine. 200. 137–144. 67 indexed citations
15.
Hyde, Richard, Sarah Hartley, & Kate Millar. (2017). European Novel Foods Policy at a Critical Juncture:Drawing lessons for future Novel Food Governancethrough a retrospective examination of Regulation 258/97. Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham). 5 indexed citations
16.
Wickson, Fern, C. Preston, Rosa Binimelis, et al.. (2017). Addressing Socio-Economic and Ethical Considerations in Biotechnology Governance: The Potential of a New Politics of Care. Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter). 1(2). 193–199. 13 indexed citations
17.
White, Dougľas R., et al.. (2017). The future’s bright but the future’s local – the rise of hyperlocal journalism in the United Kingdom. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies. 6(1). 71–82. 3 indexed citations
18.
Hartley, Sarah, et al.. (2017). Responsible Innovation and political accountability: genetically modified mosquitoes in Brazil. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 4(1). 5–23. 27 indexed citations
19.
Hartley, Sarah, et al.. (2016). Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology. PLoS Biology. 14(5). e1002453–e1002453. 44 indexed citations
20.
Hartley, Sarah. (2015). Policy masquerading as science: an examination of non-state actor involvement in European risk assessment policy for genetically modified animals. Journal of European Public Policy. 23(2). 276–295. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026