Jason Delborne

1.6k total citations
43 papers, 698 citations indexed

About

Jason Delborne is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jason Delborne has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 698 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Molecular Biology, 13 papers in Plant Science and 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jason Delborne's work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (17 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (12 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (7 papers). Jason Delborne is often cited by papers focused on CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (17 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (12 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (7 papers). Jason Delborne collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Jason Delborne's co-authors include Daniel Lee Kleinman, Ashley Anderson, Maria Powell, Abby Kinchy, Adam Kokotovich, Zachary Brown, Johanna E. Elsensohn, Gregory A. Backus, James P. Collins and Todd Kuiken and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nature Nanotechnology.

In The Last Decade

Jason Delborne

41 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jason Delborne United States 19 248 188 157 88 80 43 698
Sarah Hartley United Kingdom 18 326 1.3× 141 0.8× 218 1.4× 60 0.7× 96 1.2× 43 821
Matthias Kaiser Norway 19 149 0.6× 202 1.1× 217 1.4× 254 2.9× 75 0.9× 59 1.0k
Christopher D. Wirz United States 13 107 0.4× 325 1.7× 124 0.8× 28 0.3× 33 0.4× 28 672
Jennifer Hammock United States 10 73 0.3× 126 0.7× 33 0.2× 70 0.8× 95 1.2× 19 887
Alice L. Mauchline United Kingdom 19 57 0.2× 75 0.4× 266 1.7× 54 0.6× 41 0.5× 40 1.1k
Glenn Davis Stone United States 24 443 1.8× 170 0.9× 595 3.8× 101 1.1× 53 0.7× 67 1.7k
Michelle Prysby United States 7 90 0.4× 66 0.4× 100 0.6× 43 0.5× 95 1.2× 10 506
F.W.A. Brom Netherlands 14 82 0.3× 114 0.6× 168 1.1× 26 0.3× 164 2.0× 59 759
Markus Schmidt Austria 19 704 2.8× 86 0.5× 236 1.5× 31 0.4× 218 2.7× 42 1.2k
Anita Lavorgna United Kingdom 17 67 0.3× 465 2.5× 29 0.2× 24 0.3× 32 0.4× 54 885

Countries citing papers authored by Jason Delborne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jason Delborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason Delborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason Delborne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jason Delborne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason Delborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason Delborne. The network helps show where Jason Delborne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jason Delborne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jason Delborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jason Delborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jason Delborne. Jason Delborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vera, Ramón E., Richard Phillips, Kelly D. Zering, et al.. (2024). An economic analysis of bamboo plantations and feedstock delivered cost in the Southern US for the manufacturing of fiber‐based bioproducts. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining. 18(5). 1455–1474. 6 indexed citations
2.
Vera, Ramón E., Ronald Márquez, Richard Phillips, et al.. (2024). A Multi-Criteria Approach for Quantifying the Impact of Global Megatrends on the Pulp and Paper Industry: Insights into Digitalization, Social Behavior Change, and Sustainability. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(2). 36–36. 8 indexed citations
3.
Jayaratne, K. S. U., et al.. (2024). Competencies and training needs of extension agents for educating farmers on genetically engineered crops in Uganda. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 32–45.
4.
Campa, Maria Fernanda, Craig M. Brown, Jason Delborne, et al.. (2024). Nanotechnology solutions for the climate crisis. Nature Nanotechnology. 19(10). 1422–1426. 7 indexed citations
7.
Kokotovich, Adam, et al.. (2022). Stakeholder engagement to inform the risk assessment and governance of gene drive technology to manage spotted-wing drosophila. Journal of Environmental Management. 307. 114480–114480. 6 indexed citations
8.
Delborne, Jason, et al.. (2021). The politics of genetic technoscience for conservation: The case of blight-resistant American chestnut. Environment and Planning E Nature and Space. 5(3). 1518–1540. 4 indexed citations
9.
Mackelprang, Rebecca, Emily R. Aurand, Roel A. L. Bovenberg, et al.. (2021). Guiding Ethical Principles in Engineering Biology Research. ACS Synthetic Biology. 10(5). 907–910. 10 indexed citations
10.
Delborne, Jason, et al.. (2021). Whose intentions? What consequences? Interrogating “Intended Consequences” for conservation with environmental biotechnology. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(4). 19 indexed citations
11.
Kokotovich, Adam, Jason Delborne, Johanna E. Elsensohn, & Hannah J. Burrack. (2019). Emerging Technologies for Invasive Insects: The Role of Engagement. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 113(4). 266–279. 10 indexed citations
12.
Delborne, Jason, et al.. (2019). The genetically engineered American chestnut tree as opportunity for reciprocal restoration in Haudenosaunee communities. Biological Conservation. 232. 1–7. 24 indexed citations
13.
Rivers, Louie, et al.. (2019). Rooted in Recognition: Indigenous Environmental Justice and the Genetically Engineered American Chestnut Tree. Society & Natural Resources. 33(1). 83–100. 22 indexed citations
14.
Jones, Michael S., Jason Delborne, Johanna E. Elsensohn, Paul D. Mitchell, & Zachary Brown. (2019). Does the U.S. public support using gene drives in agriculture? And what do they want to know?. Science Advances. 5(9). eaau8462–eaau8462. 33 indexed citations
15.
Kuiken, Todd, et al.. (2019). Articulating ‘free, prior and informed consent’ (FPIC) for engineered gene drives. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 286(1917). 20191484–20191484. 24 indexed citations
16.
Godwin, John, Peter Brown, Karl J. Campbell, et al.. (2019). Rodent gene drives for conservation: opportunities and data needs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 286(1914). 20191606–20191606. 31 indexed citations
17.
Backus, Gregory A. & Jason Delborne. (2019). Threshold-Dependent Gene Drives in the Wild: Spread, Controllability, and Ecological Uncertainty. BioScience. 69(11). 900–907. 20 indexed citations
18.
Delborne, Jason, et al.. (2019). Rethinking restoration targets for American chestnut using species distribution modeling. Biodiversity and Conservation. 28(12). 3199–3220. 22 indexed citations
19.
Delborne, Jason, et al.. (2018). ‘Mapping research and governance needs for gene drives’. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 5(sup1). S4–S12. 18 indexed citations
20.
Kuzma, Jennifer, Fred Gould, Zachary Brown, et al.. (2017). A roadmap for gene drives: using institutional analysis and development to frame research needs and governance in a systems context. Journal of Responsible Innovation. 5(sup1). S13–S39. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026