Sarah Earl‐Novell

440 total citations
12 papers, 290 citations indexed

About

Sarah Earl‐Novell is a scholar working on Education, Gender Studies and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Earl‐Novell has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 290 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Education, 3 papers in Gender Studies and 3 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Sarah Earl‐Novell's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (2 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (2 papers). Sarah Earl‐Novell is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (2 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (2 papers). Sarah Earl‐Novell collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Sarah Earl‐Novell's co-authors include Diane Harley, Shannon Lawrence, C. Judson King, Sophia Krzys Acord, Ruth Woodfield, Lucy Solomon and Donna C. Jessop and has published in prestigious journals such as Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, British Journal of Sociology of Education and International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Earl‐Novell

12 papers receiving 245 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Earl‐Novell United States 7 86 84 73 45 41 12 290
Sara M. González-Betancor Spain 9 76 0.9× 140 1.7× 58 0.8× 18 0.4× 36 0.9× 33 320
Jenny Bossaller United States 11 83 1.0× 45 0.5× 17 0.2× 47 1.0× 42 1.0× 51 297
Michela Montesi Spain 10 80 0.9× 27 0.3× 53 0.7× 57 1.3× 25 0.6× 44 289
Emmanuel E. Baro Nigeria 13 254 3.0× 76 0.9× 22 0.3× 76 1.7× 42 1.0× 27 420
Alison Yeoman United Kingdom 8 136 1.6× 42 0.5× 13 0.2× 65 1.4× 46 1.1× 12 311
Selinda Berg Canada 10 207 2.4× 73 0.9× 19 0.3× 30 0.7× 81 2.0× 20 364
Alvin M. Schrader Canada 11 101 1.2× 22 0.3× 25 0.3× 36 0.8× 16 0.4× 32 305
Stella Korobili Greece 10 125 1.5× 83 1.0× 23 0.3× 49 1.1× 93 2.3× 16 316
Lisa O’Connor United States 14 139 1.6× 70 0.8× 10 0.1× 50 1.1× 21 0.5× 26 357
Cameron Barnes Australia 7 69 0.8× 87 1.0× 76 1.0× 36 0.8× 18 0.4× 12 279

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Earl‐Novell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Earl‐Novell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Earl‐Novell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Earl‐Novell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Earl‐Novell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Earl‐Novell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Earl‐Novell. The network helps show where Sarah Earl‐Novell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Earl‐Novell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Earl‐Novell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Earl‐Novell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Earl‐Novell. Sarah Earl‐Novell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Harley, Diane, Sophia Krzys Acord, Sarah Earl‐Novell, Shannon Lawrence, & C. Judson King. (2010). Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 157 indexed citations
2.
Harley, Diane, Sophia Krzys Acord, Sarah Earl‐Novell, Shannon Lawrence, & C. Judson King. (2010). Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines - Executive Summary. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 3 indexed citations
3.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2007). The Influence of Academic Values on Scholarly Publication and Communication Practices.. Journal of Electronic Publishing. 10(2). 6 indexed citations
4.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2006). The Influence of Academic Values on Scholarly Publication and Communication Practices. Research and Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.13.06.. Center for Studies in Higher Education. 2 indexed citations
5.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2006). SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION: ACADEMIC VALUES AND SUSTAINABLE MODELS. Center for Studies in Higher Education. 12 indexed citations
6.
Earl‐Novell, Sarah. (2006). A GRADUATE EXPERIENCE OF WOMEN AND INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 12(1). 65–77. 1 indexed citations
7.
Earl‐Novell, Sarah. (2006). Determining the Extent to Which Program Structure Features and Integration Mechanisms Facilitate or Impede Doctoral Student Persistence in Mathematics. International journal of doctoral studies. 1. 45–57. 34 indexed citations
8.
Woodfield, Ruth & Sarah Earl‐Novell. (2006). An assessment of the extent to which subject variation between the Arts and Sciences in relation to the award of a First Class degree can explain the ‘gender gap’ in UK universities. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 27(3). 355–372. 20 indexed citations
9.
Earl‐Novell, Sarah & Donna C. Jessop. (2005). The relationship between perceptions of pre‐menstrual syndrome and degree performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 30(4). 343–352. 1 indexed citations
10.
Woodfield, Ruth, Sarah Earl‐Novell, & Lucy Solomon. (2004). Gender and mode of assessment at university: should we assume female students are better suited to coursework and males to unseen examinations?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 30(1). 35–50. 45 indexed citations
11.
Woodfield, Ruth & Sarah Earl‐Novell. (2002). Gender and performance in HE: the impact of mode of assessment. Figshare. 1 indexed citations
12.
Earl‐Novell, Sarah. (2001). “Gendered” styles of writing and the “inequality in assessment” hypothesis: an explanation for gender differentiation in first class academic achievement at university. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 21(1/2). 160–172. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sara M. González-Betancor Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jenny Bossaller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michela Montesi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emmanuel E. Baro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alison Yeoman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Selinda Berg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alvin M. Schrader Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stella Korobili Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lisa O’Connor Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cameron Barnes
Rankless by CCL
2026