Diane Harley

755 total citations
24 papers, 451 citations indexed

About

Diane Harley is a scholar working on Information Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Diane Harley has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 451 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Information Systems, 6 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 5 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Diane Harley's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (6 papers), Research Data Management Practices (6 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers). Diane Harley is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (6 papers), Research Data Management Practices (6 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (4 papers). Diane Harley collaborates with scholars based in United States. Diane Harley's co-authors include Sophia Krzys Acord, Shannon Lawrence, Sarah Earl‐Novell, C. Judson King, Lawrence A. Rowe, Flora McMartin, Ian D. Miller, Peter Lyman, Michael B. Goldstein and Martín Trow and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, American Journal of Physical Anthropology and New Media & Society.

In The Last Decade

Diane Harley

24 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diane Harley United States 11 167 100 87 82 76 24 451
Shannon Lawrence United States 7 101 0.6× 64 0.6× 69 0.8× 45 0.5× 52 0.7× 18 298
Ewa Callahan United States 7 194 1.2× 103 1.0× 14 0.2× 81 1.0× 24 0.3× 9 422
Kathleen Burnett United States 14 188 1.1× 39 0.4× 128 1.5× 68 0.8× 52 0.7× 41 498
Heather Lea Moulaison United States 12 201 1.2× 39 0.4× 16 0.2× 62 0.8× 26 0.3× 79 412
Dario Taraborelli United States 11 242 1.4× 256 2.6× 21 0.2× 200 2.4× 82 1.1× 25 746
Laura J. Neumann United States 8 192 1.1× 14 0.1× 20 0.2× 57 0.7× 45 0.6× 10 397
Trudi Bellardo Hahn United States 9 140 0.8× 36 0.4× 23 0.3× 29 0.4× 36 0.5× 25 351
Maggie Fieldhouse United Kingdom 3 206 1.2× 11 0.1× 99 1.1× 79 1.0× 46 0.6× 3 424
Karla Hahn United States 11 227 1.4× 35 0.3× 17 0.2× 39 0.5× 25 0.3× 31 417
Raym Crow United States 6 312 1.9× 155 1.6× 13 0.1× 30 0.4× 86 1.1× 14 535

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Harley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Harley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Harley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Harley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Harley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Harley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Harley. The network helps show where Diane Harley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane Harley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane Harley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane Harley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane Harley. Diane Harley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2016). Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Studies in Higher Education. 7 indexed citations
2.
Harley, Diane. (2013). Scholarly Communication: Cultural Contexts, Evolving Models. Science. 342(6154). 80–82. 21 indexed citations
3.
Acord, Sophia Krzys & Diane Harley. (2012). Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0. New Media & Society. 15(3). 379–397. 44 indexed citations
4.
Harley, Diane & Sophia Krzys Acord. (2011). Peer Review in Academic Promotion and Publishing: Its Meaning, Locus, and Future. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 25 indexed citations
5.
Harley, Diane, Sophia Krzys Acord, Sarah Earl‐Novell, Shannon Lawrence, & C. Judson King. (2010). Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 157 indexed citations
6.
Harley, Diane, Sophia Krzys Acord, Sarah Earl‐Novell, Shannon Lawrence, & C. Judson King. (2010). Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines - Executive Summary. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 3 indexed citations
7.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2009). Affordable and Open Textbooks: An Exploratory Study of Faculty Attitudes. Research & Occasional Paper Series. CSHE.9.09.. Center for Studies in Higher Education. 4 indexed citations
8.
Harley, Diane. (2008). The University as Publisher: Summary of a Meeting Held at UC Berkeley on November 1, 2007. Journal of Electronic Publishing. 11(2). 2 indexed citations
9.
Harley, Diane. (2007). Toward an Effective Understanding of Website Users: Advantages and Pitfalls of Linking Transaction Log Analyses and Online Surveys. D-Lib Magazine. 13(3). 1. 6 indexed citations
10.
Harley, Diane & Shannon Lawrence. (2007). The Regulation of E-learning: New National and International Policy Perspectives. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 2 indexed citations
11.
Harley, Diane. (2007). Use and Users of Digital Resources.. ˜The œEDUCAUSE quarterly/EDUCAUSE quarterly. 30(4). 12–20. 15 indexed citations
13.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2006). SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION: ACADEMIC VALUES AND SUSTAINABLE MODELS. Center for Studies in Higher Education. 12 indexed citations
14.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2006). The Influence of Academic Values on Scholarly Publication and Communication Practices. Research and Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.13.06.. Center for Studies in Higher Education. 2 indexed citations
15.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2006). WHY STUDY USERS? An Environmental Scan of Use and Users of Digital Resources in Humanities and Social Sciences Undergraduate Education. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 2 indexed citations
16.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2003). An Analysis of Technology Enhancements in a Large Lecture Course.. Issue Lab (Candid). 26(3). 26–33. 7 indexed citations
17.
Harley, Diane, et al.. (2003). Costs, Culture, and Complexity: An Analysis of Technology Enhancements in a Large Lecture Course at UC Berkeley. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 33 indexed citations
18.
Harley, Diane. (2002). Investing in Educational Technologies: The Challenge of Reconciling Institutional Strategies, Faculty Goals, and Student Expectations. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 9 indexed citations
19.
Harley, Diane, Michael B. Goldstein, Sally M. Johnstone, et al.. (2002). University Teaching as E-Business? Research and Policy Agendas. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 6 indexed citations
20.
Rowe, Lawrence A., et al.. (2001). BIBS: A Lecture Webcasting System. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026