Sara Steegen

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 815 citations indexed

About

Sara Steegen is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Sara Steegen has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 815 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 2 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Sara Steegen's work include Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). Sara Steegen is often cited by papers focused on Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). Sara Steegen collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Israel. Sara Steegen's co-authors include Francis Tuerlinckx, Wolf Vanpaemel, Andrew Gelman, Dominiek Reynaerts, H. Van Brussel, Emmanuel Vander Poorten, Jun Qian, Wim De Neys, Helena Matute and Miguel A. Vadillo and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Psychological Methods and International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture.

In The Last Decade

Sara Steegen

8 papers receiving 799 citations

Hit Papers

Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sara Steegen Belgium 5 199 196 123 113 97 8 815
Coosje Lisabet Sterre Veldkamp Netherlands 10 108 0.5× 140 0.7× 104 0.8× 284 2.5× 90 0.9× 13 850
Samantha F. Anderson United States 12 154 0.8× 191 1.0× 78 0.6× 103 0.9× 156 1.6× 34 788
Frederik Aust Germany 12 205 1.0× 146 0.7× 203 1.7× 67 0.6× 169 1.7× 26 791
Jason Geller United States 13 309 1.6× 226 1.2× 146 1.2× 90 0.8× 169 1.7× 20 828
Peter J. Etchells United Kingdom 11 286 1.4× 194 1.0× 153 1.2× 112 1.0× 104 1.1× 16 803
Aba Szollosi Hungary 12 148 0.7× 95 0.5× 94 0.8× 66 0.6× 97 1.0× 21 663
James A. Grange United Kingdom 14 484 2.4× 221 1.1× 144 1.2× 93 0.8× 169 1.7× 44 986
Clintin P. Davis‐Stober United States 18 266 1.3× 166 0.8× 71 0.6× 32 0.3× 79 0.8× 62 1.1k
Thomas Scherndl Austria 11 96 0.5× 112 0.6× 75 0.6× 99 0.9× 152 1.6× 22 620
Minjeong Jeon United States 18 106 0.5× 276 1.4× 77 0.6× 56 0.5× 118 1.2× 73 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Steegen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Steegen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Steegen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Steegen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Steegen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Steegen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Steegen. The network helps show where Sara Steegen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Steegen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Steegen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Steegen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Steegen. Sara Steegen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Steegen, Sara, et al.. (2020). The reproducibility of statistical results in psychological research: An investigation using unpublished raw data.. Psychological Methods. 26(5). 527–546. 33 indexed citations
2.
Steegen, Sara, Woojae Kim, Wiebe R. Pestman, Francis Tuerlinckx, & Wolf Vanpaemel. (2017). A theoretical note on the prior information criterion. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 80. 33–39. 1 indexed citations
3.
Steegen, Sara, Francis Tuerlinckx, & Wolf Vanpaemel. (2016). Using parameter space partitioning to evaluate a model’s qualitative fit. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 24(2). 617–631. 4 indexed citations
4.
Steegen, Sara, Francis Tuerlinckx, Andrew Gelman, & Wolf Vanpaemel. (2016). Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 11(5). 702–712. 734 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Steegen, Sara, et al.. (2014). Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 786–786. 18 indexed citations
6.
Matute, Helena, Sara Steegen, & Miguel A. Vadillo. (2014). Outcome probability modulates anticipatory behavior to signals that are equally reliable. Adaptive Behavior. 22(3). 207–216. 3 indexed citations
7.
Steegen, Sara & Wim De Neys. (2012). Belief inhibition in children’s reasoning: Memory-based evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 112(2). 231–242. 6 indexed citations
8.
Qian, Jun, Sara Steegen, Emmanuel Vander Poorten, Dominiek Reynaerts, & H. Van Brussel. (2002). EDM texturing of multicrystalline silicon wafer and EFG ribbon for solar cell application. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 42(15). 1657–1664. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026