Sara Prot

14 papers receiving 753 citations

Peers

Sara Prot
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Communication 110
  • Social Psychology 289
  • Sociology and Political Science 545
  • Education 329
  • Literature and Literary Theory 119
Replace Stephanie J. Tobin with:
Stephanie J. Tobin Australia
Shintaro Yukawa Japan
DeLeon L. Gray United States
Aimee E. Miller‐Ott United States
Lawrence A. Kutner United States
Tuncay Ayas Türkiye
Francesca Gioia Italy
Karyn Riddle United States
Julia Kneer Netherlands
Valeria de Palo Italy
Sara Prot relative to Stephanie J. Tobin Australia Stephanie J. Tobin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Stephanie J. Tobin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara Prot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Prot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Prot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Prot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Prot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Prot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Prot. The network helps show where Sara Prot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara Prot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara Prot Line = papers co-authored together Sara Prot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2017175
2 2013162
3 2015131
4 2014100
5 201757
6 201239
7
The positive and negative effects of video game play.
201433
8 201632
9 201527
10 198916
11
Media as agents of socialization
201514
12 202013
13 201412
14 20133
15
The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Sport Interests for Taekwondo and Other Sports of Urban Elementary School Pupils
20110
16 20150

About Sara Prot

Sara Prot is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Education, Communication and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (6 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (2 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (110 citations), Social Psychology (289 citations), Sociology and Political Science (545 citations), Education (329 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (119 citations). Sara Prot has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Croatia. Frequent co-authors include Craig A. Anderson, Douglas A. Gentile, Muniba Saleem, Anthony F. Lemieux, Angeline Khoo, Edward L. Swing, Dongdong Li, Ben C. P. Lam, Margareta Jelić and Wayne Warburton. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, JAMA Pediatrics, Pediatric Clinics of North America, Neuroradiology and Psychology of Violence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact