Sara Heinämaa
- Philosophy top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 5%
- Co-authors
- Pauliina RemesLilli AlanenDan ZahaviHans RuinClaudia CardDebra BergoffenMary SirridgeMoira Gatens
- Topics
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (21 papers)Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (17 papers)Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre (10 papers)
In The Last Decade
Sara Heinämaa
41 papers receiving 248 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Philosophy 196
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 128
- Political Science and International Relations 68
- Sociology and Political Science 66
- History 41
Countries citing papers authored by Sara Heinämaa
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara Heinämaa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara Heinämaa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara Heinämaa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara Heinämaa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara Heinämaa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara Heinämaa. The network helps show where Sara Heinämaa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara Heinämaa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara Heinämaa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara Heinämaa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara Heinämaa. Sara Heinämaa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | Chapter 6: Future and others | 1 |
| 10 | Psychology and philosophy : inquiries into the soul from late scholasticism to contemporary thought | 3 |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | The Background of Simone de Beauvoir's Metaphysical Novel: Kierkegaard and Husserl | 1 |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | Metaphysics, Facticity, Interpretation: Phenomenology in the Nordic Countries | 6 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | ¿Qué es ser mujer? Butler y Beauvoir sobre los fundamentos de la diferencia sexual | 2 |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | Naisten tunneherkkyys : filosofinen keskustelu tunteiden järjellisyydestä | 1 |
| 20 | Paikka tutkimuksessa : henkilökohtaisen paikanmäärityksen vaatimus naistutkimuksessa | 1 |
About Sara Heinämaa
Sara Heinämaa is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 55 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (21 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (17 papers) and Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (196 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (128 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (31 citations). Sara Heinämaa has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Pauliina Remes, Lilli Alanen, Dan Zahavi, Hans Ruin, Claudia Card, Debra Bergoffen, Mary Sirridge, Moira Gatens, Margaret A. Simons and David Carr. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Synthese and Hypatia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.