Moira Gatens
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- G. E. R. LloydBarbara CaineAlison MackinnonNancy J. PollockSusan JamesClaudia CardValerie BraithwaiteDeborah Mitchell
- Topics
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (14 papers)Political Theology and Sovereignty (6 papers)Foucault, Power, and Ethics (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Moira Gatens
44 papers receiving 634 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Sociology and Political Science 389
- Gender Studies 242
- Philosophy 219
- Political Science and International Relations 140
- Cultural Studies 73
Countries citing papers authored by Moira Gatens
This map shows the geographic impact of Moira Gatens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moira Gatens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moira Gatens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Moira Gatens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moira Gatens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moira Gatens. The network helps show where Moira Gatens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Moira Gatens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Moira Gatens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Moira Gatens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Moira Gatens. Moira Gatens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Spinoza's hard path to freedom | 2 |
| 8 | Spinoza's disturbing thesis: Power, norms and fiction in the tractatus theologico-politicus | 7 |
| 9 | Freedom and Determinism in 'Middlemarch', or Dorothea, the Lunatic | 0 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Collective Imaginings: Spinoza, Past and Present | 194 |
| 16 | Australian Feminism: a companion | 45 |
| 17 | Imaginary bodies: an interview with Moira Gatens. -by Sherman, Emile- | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality | 325 |
| 20 | 15 |
About Moira Gatens
Moira Gatens is a scholar working on Philosophy, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 877 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (14 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (6 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (242 citations), Philosophy (219 citations) and Cultural Studies (73 citations). Moira Gatens has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. E. R. Lloyd, Barbara Caine, Alison Mackinnon, Nancy J. Pollock, Susan James, Claudia Card, Valerie Braithwaite, Deborah Mitchell, Mary Sirridge and Helen E. Longino. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Philosophical Quarterly and Pacific Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.