Sara C. Motta
- Public Administration top 5%
-
- Latin American socio-political dynamics 9
- Political theory and Gramsci 4
- Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America 4
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics 3
- Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality 3
- Gender Studies top 5%
-
- Politics and Society in Latin America 13
- Urban Studies top 5%
-
- Latin American and Latino Studies 5
-
- Critical and Liberation Pedagogy 3
- Co-authors
- Laurence CoxAna Margarida EstevesAnna BennettSarah AmslerAlf Gunvald NilsenPhoebe EveringhamBarry K. GillsJames Goodman
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Antipode (1 paper)Political Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomColombia
In The Last Decade
Sara C. Motta
40 papers receiving 858 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Public Administration 54
- Sociology and Political Science 550
- Gender Studies 118
- Political Science and International Relations 273
- Urban Studies 49
Countries citing papers authored by Sara C. Motta
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara C. Motta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara C. Motta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara C. Motta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara C. Motta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara C. Motta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara C. Motta. The network helps show where Sara C. Motta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Sara C. Motta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 5 | Feminising our revolutions: New movements in Latin America offer inspiration and re-enchantment | 2019 | 2 |
| 6 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 13 | Social movements in the global south : dispossession, development and resistance | 2011 | 20 |
| 14 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 16 | Why critical pedagogy and popular education matter today | 2010 | 4 |
| 17 | Issue two editorial:"Civil society" versus social movements | 2009 | 1 |
| 18 | 2007 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 7 |
About Sara C. Motta
Sara C. Motta is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies and Cultural Studies, having authored 44 papers that have together received 961 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (13 papers), Latin American socio-political dynamics (9 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (5 papers), Political theory and Gramsci (4 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (4 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers), Critical and Liberation Pedagogy (3 papers) and Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (54 citations), Sociology and Political Science (550 citations) and Gender Studies (118 citations). Sara C. Motta has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Laurence Cox, Ana Margarida Esteves, Anna Bennett, Sarah Amsler, Alf Gunvald Nilsen, Phoebe Everingham, Barry K. Gills, James Goodman, David Bailey and Catherine Eschle. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Antipode and Political Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.