Sara C. Motta
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Education top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Laurence CoxAna Margarida EstevesAnna BennettSarah AmslerAlf Gunvald NilsenPhoebe EveringhamBarry K. GillsJames Goodman
- Topics
- Politics and Society in Latin America (13 papers)Latin American socio-political dynamics (9 papers)Latin American and Latino Studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAntipodePolitical Studies
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomColombia
In The Last Decade
Sara C. Motta
40 papers receiving 858 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Sociology and Political Science 550
- Political Science and International Relations 273
- Education 186
- Gender Studies 118
- General Health Professions 66
Countries citing papers authored by Sara C. Motta
This map shows the geographic impact of Sara C. Motta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara C. Motta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara C. Motta more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sara C. Motta
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara C. Motta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara C. Motta. The network helps show where Sara C. Motta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sara C. Motta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sara C. Motta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sara C. Motta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sara C. Motta. Sara C. Motta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | Feminising our revolutions: New movements in Latin America offer inspiration and re-enchantment | 2 |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | Social movements in the global south : dispossession, development and resistance | 20 |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | Why critical pedagogy and popular education matter today | 4 |
| 17 | Issue two editorial:"Civil society" versus social movements | 1 |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Sara C. Motta
Sara C. Motta is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies and Cultural Studies, having authored 44 papers that have together received 961 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (13 papers), Latin American socio-political dynamics (9 papers) and Latin American and Latino Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (54 citations), Sociology and Political Science (550 citations) and Gender Studies (118 citations). Sara C. Motta has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Laurence Cox, Ana Margarida Esteves, Anna Bennett, Sarah Amsler, Alf Gunvald Nilsen, Phoebe Everingham, Barry K. Gills, James Goodman, David Bailey and Catherine Eschle. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Antipode and Political Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.