Santiago Conde
- Molecular Biology
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Concepción PérezMarı́a Isabel Rodrı́guez-FrancoAna Martı́nezManuela G. LópezMércedes VillarroyaAntonio G. Garcı́aGema C. González-MuñozDaniel I. Pérez
- Topics
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (15 papers)Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (15 papers)Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (9 papers)
In The Last Decade
Santiago Conde
57 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Molecular Biology 612
- Organic Chemistry 586
- Pharmacology 551
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 318
- Physiology 229
Countries citing papers authored by Santiago Conde
This map shows the geographic impact of Santiago Conde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Santiago Conde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Santiago Conde more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Santiago Conde
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Santiago Conde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Santiago Conde. The network helps show where Santiago Conde may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Santiago Conde
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Santiago Conde. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Santiago Conde based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Santiago Conde. Santiago Conde is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 48 | |
| 8 | 46 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | Synthesis and beta adrenoceptor blocking activity of thiophenic analogs of toliprolol and bevantolol and closely related compounds | 6 |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Santiago Conde
Santiago Conde is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology and Biochemistry, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (15 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (15 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (551 citations), Organic Chemistry (586 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (318 citations). Santiago Conde has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Belgium and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Concepción Pérez, Marı́a Isabel Rodrı́guez-Franco, Ana Martı́nez, Manuela G. López, Mércedes Villarroya, Antonio G. Garcı́a, Gema C. González-Muñoz, Daniel I. Pérez, Carmen Gil and María Isabel Fernández‐Bachiller. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.