Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Should we worry about filter bubbles?
2016286 citationsFrederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Damian Trilling et al.UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Balázs Bodó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Balázs Bodó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Balázs Bodó more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Balázs Bodó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Balázs Bodó. The network helps show where Balázs Bodó may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Balázs Bodó
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Balázs Bodó.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Balázs Bodó based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Balázs Bodó. Balázs Bodó is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Senftleben, Martin, Thomas Margoni, Balázs Bodó, et al.. (2022). Ensuring the Visibility and Accessibility of European Creative Content on the World Market: The Need for Copyright Data Improvement in the Light of New Technologies and the Opportunity Arising from Article 17 of the CDSM Directive. EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam).3 indexed citations
Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen, Tom Dobber, Sanne Kruikemeier, et al.. (2019). Online politieke microtargeting: Een zegen of een vloek voor de democratie?. Nederlandsch juristenblad. 94(10). 662–669.
Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen, Damian Trilling, Judith Möller, et al.. (2016). Should we worry about filter bubbles?. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).286 indexed citations breakdown →
Petitta, Marco, et al.. (2015). The KINDRA H2020 Project: a knowledge inventory for hydrogeology research. EGUGA. 8481.1 indexed citations
16.
Bodó, Balázs. (2015). Piracy Versus Privacy: An Analysis of Values Encoded in the PirateBrowser. International journal of communication. 9. 818–838.3 indexed citations
Bodó, Balázs. (2013). Set the fox to watch the geese: voluntary IP regimes in piratical file-sharing communities. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 241–264.7 indexed citations
19.
Bodó, Balázs, et al.. (2012). Info Capacity| A Meta Study of 26 How Much Information Studies: Sine Qua Nons and Solutions. International journal of communication. 6. 33.1 indexed citations
20.
Bodó, Balázs, et al.. (2012). Theatrical distribution and P2P movie piracy: a survey of P2P networks in Hungary using transactional data. International journal of communication. 6. 413–445.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.