Sandra Metts

2.8k citations
37 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 20

Sandra Metts

37 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Sandra Metts
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • Gender Studies 236
  • Clinical Psychology 488
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 275
  • Language and Linguistics 189
Replace Kathryn Dindia with:
Kathryn Dindia United States
Alan Sillars United States
Toni Falbo United States
Robert S. Weisskirch United States
Wendy Samter United States
Rowland S. Miller United States
Vincent R. Waldron United States
Philip Blumstein United States
Elizabeth Aries United States
Charles T. Hill United States
Sandra Metts relative to Kathryn Dindia United States Kathryn Dindia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kathryn Dindia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Metts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Metts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Metts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Metts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Metts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Metts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Metts. The network helps show where Sandra Metts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Metts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Metts Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Metts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Romantic beliefs and Polish young adults’ relationship status
20151
2
The Factor Structure of the Polish-Language Version of the Romantic Beliefs Scale
20143
3 201425
4 201127
5 201014
6 200814
7 200418
8 199998
9 1998206
10 199610
11 1996123
12 19951
13 199549
14 1994159
15
The role of relationship characteristics in the provision and effectiveness of supportive messages among nursing professionals.
199413
16 19933
17 1989167
18 1989121
19 198638
20 198656

About Sandra Metts

Sandra Metts is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Demography, Clinical Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (17 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (5 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.1k citations), Gender Studies (236 citations), Clinical Psychology (488 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (275 citations) and Language and Linguistics (189 citations). Sandra Metts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Poland. Frequent co-authors include William R. Cupach, Susan Sprecher, Walid A. Afifi, Brian H. Spitzberg, Diane Felmlee, Beverley Fehr, Susan S. Hendrick, Clyde Hendrick, Vincent Hazleton and Elaine Hatfield. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Western Journal of Communication, Annals of the International Communication Association, Communication Studies and Communication Monographs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026