Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Institutions and Social Conflict
19921.3k citationsJack KnightCambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Knight more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Knight. The network helps show where Jack Knight may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Knight
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Knight.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Knight based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Knight. Jack Knight is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Knight, Jack, et al.. (2016). How Bayesian are Judges. Nevada law journal. 16(3). 1061–1084.1 indexed citations
7.
Epstein, Lee & Jack Knight. (2013). Reconsidering Judicial Preferences. Annual Review of Political Science. 16(1). 11–31.81 indexed citations
8.
Knight, Jack. (2009). Are Empiricists Asking the Right Questions About Judicial Decisionmaking. Duke Law Journal. 58(7). 1531–1556.11 indexed citations
9.
Levi, Margaret, et al.. (2008). Designing Democratic Government: Making Institutions Work.12 indexed citations
Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, & Andrew D. Martin. (2003). The Political (Science) Context of Judging. Saint Louis University law journal. 47(3). 783.18 indexed citations
Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, & Olga Shvetsova. (2001). Comparing Judicial Selection Systems. eYLS (Yale Law School). 10(1). 7.25 indexed citations
14.
Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, & Andrew D. Martin. (2001). The Supreme Court as A Strategic National Policymaker. Emory law journal. 50. 583.91 indexed citations
Epstein, Lee, Jack Knight, & Andrew D. Martin. (2001). Dahl Symposium: The Supreme Court as a Strategic National Policymaker. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).4 indexed citations
18.
Epstein, Lee & Jack Knight. (2000). Piercing the Veil: William J. Brennan's Account of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. eYLS (Yale Law School). 19(2). 341.1 indexed citations
19.
Knight, Jack. (1998). The Bases of Cooperation: Social Norms and the Rule of Law. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 154(4). 754–754.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.