Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Sam Ransbotham
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Ransbotham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Ransbotham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Ransbotham more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Ransbotham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Ransbotham. The network helps show where Sam Ransbotham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam Ransbotham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam Ransbotham.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam Ransbotham based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sam Ransbotham. Sam Ransbotham is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Adomavičius, Gediminas, et al.. (2019). The hidden side effects of recommendation systems. MIT Sloan management review. 60(2). 13–15.11 indexed citations
7.
Ransbotham, Sam. (2016). Enough health care data for an army: The million veteran program. MIT Sloan management review. 57(3). 1–1.3 indexed citations
Ransbotham, Sam. (2016). Data and devices bringing transparency to energy use. MIT Sloan management review. 57(2). 5–5.1 indexed citations
10.
Ransbotham, Sam. (2016). Using unstructured data to tidy up credit reporting. MIT Sloan management review. 57(2). 2–2.1 indexed citations
11.
Ransbotham, Sam, et al.. (2016). Beyond the hype: The hard work behind analytics success. MIT Sloan management review. 57(3). 6–6.76 indexed citations
12.
Ransbotham, Sam, et al.. (2015). Minding the analytics gap. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 26(3). 63–68.34 indexed citations
13.
Ransbotham, Sam. (2015). Marketing in five dimensions. MIT Sloan management review. 57(1). 5–5.1 indexed citations
14.
Lurie, Nicholas H., et al.. (2013). The Content and Impact of Mobile Versus Desktop Reviews. ACR North American Advances.4 indexed citations
15.
Kane, Gerald C., Sam Ransbotham, & Andrew C. Boynton. (2012). Is High Performance Contagious among Knowledge Workers. International Conference on Information Systems.6 indexed citations
16.
Kane, Gerald C. & Sam Ransbotham. (2012). CODIFICATION AND COLLABORATION : INFORMATION QUALITY IN SOCIAL MEDIA. International Conference on Information Systems.12 indexed citations
17.
Mitra, Sabyasachi & Sam Ransbotham. (2012). The Effects of Information Disclosure Policy on the Diffusion of Security Attacks. International Conference on Information Systems.2 indexed citations
18.
Ransbotham, Sam. (2010). An Empirical Analysis of Exploitation Attempts Based on Vulnerabilities in Open Source Software..12 indexed citations
Ransbotham, Sam, et al.. (2008). Are Markets for Vulnerabilities Effective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 24.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.