Sally Jane Giles

2.1k citations
66 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Sally Jane Giles

64 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Sally Jane Giles
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Emergency Medical Services 353
  • Pharmacy 138
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 23
  • Health Information Management 71
  • General Health Professions 265
Replace Douglas James Noble with:
Douglas James Noble United Kingdom
Mondher Letaief Tunisia
Marco Di Muzio Italy
Shuh‐Jen Sheu Taiwan
Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik Norway
AkkeNeel Talsma United States
Emanuele Di Simone Italy
Glenn S. Takata United States
W. James King Canada
Michael P. Silver United States
Sally Jane Giles relative to Douglas James Noble United Kingdom Douglas James Noble's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Douglas James Noble · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sally Jane Giles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sally Jane Giles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sally Jane Giles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sally Jane Giles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sally Jane Giles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sally Jane Giles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sally Jane Giles. The network helps show where Sally Jane Giles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sally Jane Giles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sally Jane Giles Line = papers co-authored together Sally Jane Giles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012243
2 201794
3 201580
4 201373
5 200872
6 201559
7 201358
8 202050
9 202049
10 200647
11 201245
12 200334
13 202029
14 201826
15 200825
16 201524
17 200223
18 202023
19 200222
20 201522

About Sally Jane Giles

Sally Jane Giles is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, Health Information Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (17 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (5 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (353 citations), Pharmacy (138 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (23 citations), Health Information Management (71 citations) and General Health Professions (265 citations). Sally Jane Giles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Lawton, Rosemary McEachan, John Wright, Sudeh Cheraghi‐Sohi, Ian S Watt, Stephen Campbell, Reema Sirriyeh, Janis M. Miyasaki, Andrea L. Hernan and Gavin Daker‐White. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Quality & Safety, Health Expectations, BMJ Open, Journal of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Surgery International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact