Sadia Shakeel

80 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Sadia Shakeel
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 88
  • Toxicology 42
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 23
  • Family Practice 23
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 9
Replace Uday Venkat Mateti with:
Uday Venkat Mateti India
Sarah Pontefract United Kingdom
Lama Nazer Jordan
Binaya Sapkota Nepal
Bander Balkhi Saudi Arabia
Faris El‐Dahiyat United Arab Emirates
Brittany L. Melton United States
Jens Kaltschmidt Germany
Ziyad S. Almalki Saudi Arabia
Brian Serumaga United States
Sadia Shakeel relative to Uday Venkat Mateti India Uday Venkat Mateti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Uday Venkat Mateti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sadia Shakeel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sadia Shakeel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sadia Shakeel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sadia Shakeel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sadia Shakeel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sadia Shakeel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sadia Shakeel. The network helps show where Sadia Shakeel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sadia Shakeel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sadia Shakeel Line = papers co-authored together Sadia Shakeel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202043
2 202031
3 202128
4 202024
5 201424
6 202124
7 202322
8 202019
9 202118
10 202017
11 202115
12
ATTITUDINAL SURVEY TO ASSESS MEDICAL AND DENTAL STUDENTS' BELIEF OF ADR REPORTING IN PAKISTAN
201413
13 201512
14 20208
15 20138
16 20238
17 20168
18 20197
19 20207
20 20217

About Sadia Shakeel

Sadia Shakeel is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 86 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (12 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (7 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (7 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (7 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (6 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (4 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (4 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (88 citations), Toxicology (42 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (23 citations), Family Practice (23 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (9 citations). Sadia Shakeel has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Mohamed Azmi Hassali, Anees ur Rehman, Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, Muhammad Majid Khan, Muhammad Fawad Rasool, Atta Abbas Naqvi, Shahid Shah, Hina Rehman, Khezar Hayat and Rabia Hussain. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Public Health, Scientific Reports, Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, Public Organization Review and Heliyon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact