Public Organization Review

769 papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 769 papers published in Public Organization Review in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Public Organization Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (249 papers), Public Administration (230 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (224 papers) specifically the topics of Public Policy and Administration Research (210 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (76 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Organization Review are Tom Christensen, Ali Farazmand, Roger Wettenhall, Per Lægreid, Thomas Schillemans, Kutsal Yesilkagit, Paul Dragos Aligică, B. Guy Peters, Bahaudin G. Mujtaba and Noore Alam Siddiquee.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Public Organization Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Organization Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Organization Review.

Countries where authors publish in Public Organization Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Organization Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Organization Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Organization Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025