S. Kliem
Impact in
- Aerospace Engineering top 0.5%
- Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
- Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
- Combustion and Detonation Processes
- Radiation top 5%
- Nuclear Physics and Applications
Papers in
-
- Nuclear reactor physics and engineering 98
- Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics 85
- Radiation 14
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 13
- Co-authors
- Ulrich L. RohdeThomas HöhneF.‐P. WeißHorst-Michael PrasserE. FridmanUlrich BiederFrank-Peter WeißU. Grundmann
In The Last Decade
S. Kliem
102 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Aerospace Engineering 1.3k
- Radiation 217
- Materials Chemistry 866
- Computational Mechanics 231
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 90
Countries citing papers authored by S. Kliem
This map shows the geographic impact of S. Kliem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Kliem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Kliem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. Kliem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Kliem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Kliem. The network helps show where S. Kliem may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Kliem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 12 | WASA-BOSS. ATHLET-CD model for severe accident analysis for a generic KONVOI reactor | 2015 | 4 |
| 13 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 34 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 20 |
About S. Kliem
S. Kliem is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Radiation, Materials Chemistry, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Computational Mechanics, having authored 106 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (98 papers), Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (85 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (66 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (13 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (9 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (8 papers), Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics (6 papers) and Heat transfer and supercritical fluids (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (1.3k citations), Radiation (217 citations), Materials Chemistry (866 citations), Computational Mechanics (231 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (90 citations). S. Kliem has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich L. Rohde, Thomas Höhne, F.‐P. Weiß, Horst-Michael Prasser, E. Fridman, Ulrich Bieder, Frank-Peter Weiß, U. Grundmann, Alexander Grahn and Gerhard Grunwald. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Engineering and Design, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Kerntechnik, Nuclear Technology and Nuclear Engineering and Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.