S. Engelborghs
- Physiology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Peter Paul De DeynRudi D’HoogePeter MariënRaf BrounsErik FransénBarbara PickutPatrick SantensG.R. Castro
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsItaly
In The Last Decade
S. Engelborghs
25 papers receiving 994 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Physiology 375
- Psychiatry and Mental health 254
- Molecular Biology 251
- Neurology 223
- Neurology 196
Countries citing papers authored by S. Engelborghs
This map shows the geographic impact of S. Engelborghs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Engelborghs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Engelborghs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. Engelborghs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Engelborghs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Engelborghs. The network helps show where S. Engelborghs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Engelborghs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Engelborghs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Engelborghs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Engelborghs. S. Engelborghs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 72 | |
| 3 | 68 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | Cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome without mental retardation in two patients with Gillespie syndrome. | 1 |
| 8 | Actigraphic measurement of motor deficits in acute ischaemic | 1 |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 147 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 97 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Cerebellar neurocognition: a new avenue. | 23 |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | Pathophysiology of epilepsy. | 98 |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 54 |
About S. Engelborghs
S. Engelborghs is a scholar working on Neurology, Rehabilitation and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (196 citations), Rehabilitation (134 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (254 citations). S. Engelborghs has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Peter Paul De Deyn, Rudi D’Hooge, Peter Mariën, Raf Brouns, Erik Fransén, Barbara Pickut, Patrick Santens, G.R. Castro, Christine Labeur and M. Rosseneu. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Neurology, Journal of Lipid Research and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.