Majda Azermai
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert Vander SticheleCarlos E. DuránMonique ElseviersMirko PetrovićThierry ChristiaensLuc Van BortelLuc M. Van BortelJolyce Bourgeois
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (20 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumCzechiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Majda Azermai
34 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 612
- Psychiatry and Mental health 453
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 238
- Economics and Econometrics 235
- General Health Professions 187
Countries citing papers authored by Majda Azermai
This map shows the geographic impact of Majda Azermai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Majda Azermai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Majda Azermai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Majda Azermai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Majda Azermai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Majda Azermai. The network helps show where Majda Azermai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Majda Azermai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Majda Azermai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Majda Azermai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Majda Azermai. Majda Azermai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 266 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | Barriers of antipsychotic discontinuation among older adults: a focus group discussion study | 1 |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 139 |
About Majda Azermai
Majda Azermai is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Research and Theory and Family Practice, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (20 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (612 citations), Family Practice (94 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (453 citations). Majda Azermai has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Vander Stichele, Carlos E. Durán, Monique Elseviers, Mirko Petrović, Thierry Christiaens, Luc Van Bortel, Luc M. Van Bortel, Jolyce Bourgeois, Bert Vaes and Jean‐Marie Degryse. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medicine and Journal of Hypertension.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.