Ruth Sander

690 citations
82 papers · 499 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Sander

66 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Ruth Sander
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 68
  • Health 176
  • General Health Professions 186
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
  • Demography 53
Replace Pernilla Hillerås with:
Pernilla Hillerås Sweden
Katherine H. Leith United States
Kathryn Quinn United Kingdom
Tiina-Mari Lyyra Finland
Fatemeh Estebsari Iran
Susan S. Merrill United States
Denise St‐Cyr Tribble Canada
Nasibeh Zanjari Iran
Mei‐Ju Chi Taiwan
Andy Cowan United Kingdom
Ruth Sander relative to Pernilla Hillerås Sweden Pernilla Hillerås's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Pernilla Hillerås · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Sander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Sander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Sander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Sander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Sander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Sander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Sander. The network helps show where Ruth Sander may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Sander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Sander Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Sander links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005250
2 199919
3 200917
4 199816
5 199812
6 20069
7 20059
8 20058
9
Kinetics and products of the reactions BrO + DMS and Br + DMS at 298K
19998
10 20057
11 20117
12 20106
13 20006
14 20176
15 20006
16 20135
17 20015
18
So much to learn: long-stay wards.
19845
19 19994
20 20054

About Ruth Sander

Ruth Sander is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery and General Health Professions, having authored 82 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (2 papers) and Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (68 citations), Health (176 citations), General Health Professions (186 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations) and Demography (53 citations). Ruth Sander has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Phil Russell, Philip K. Russell, John N. Crowley, T. Ingham, Paul J. Crutzen, D. Bauer, Pat Morris, Arthur I. Auer and Janice D. Nunnelee. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Palliative Nursing, Nursing Older People, Nursing Standard, British Journal of Nursing and Nursing and Residential Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact