Philip K. Russell
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Infectious Diseases top 0.2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 0.2%
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Michael T. OsterholmTrish M. PerlKevin TonatJerome HauerGerald ParkerEdward M. EitzenThomas V. InglesbyMichael S. Ascher
- Topics
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control (56 papers)Viral Infections and Vectors (30 papers)Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomThailand
In The Last Decade
Philip K. Russell
108 papers receiving 8.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Molecular Biology 3.5k
- Infectious Diseases 3.4k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3.1k
- Genetics 2.1k
- Epidemiology 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Philip K. Russell
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip K. Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip K. Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip K. Russell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip K. Russell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip K. Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip K. Russell. The network helps show where Philip K. Russell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip K. Russell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip K. Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip K. Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip K. Russell. Philip K. Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49 | |
| 2 | 118 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 45 | |
| 6 | Anthrax as a Biological Weapon, 2002breakdown → | 729 |
| 7 | Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon | 95 |
| 8 | Botulinum Toxin as a Biological Weaponbreakdown → | 1297 |
| 9 | Plague as a Biological Weaponbreakdown → | 708 |
| 10 | Smallpox as a Biological Weaponbreakdown → | 1179 |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 107 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 158 | |
| 20 | Intestinal Biopsies and Absorption Studies in Young Pakistani Men. | 2 |
About Philip K. Russell
Philip K. Russell is a scholar working on Virology, Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 111 papers that have together received 9.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (56 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (30 papers) and Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (1.1k citations), Infectious Diseases (3.4k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (3.1k citations). Philip K. Russell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Michael T. Osterholm, Trish M. Perl, Kevin Tonat, Jerome Hauer, Gerald Parker, Edward M. Eitzen, Thomas V. Inglesby, Michael S. Ascher, John G. Bartlett and Walter E. Brandt. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and The Journal of Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.