British Journal of Nursing

7.5k papers and 55.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.5k papers published in British Journal of Nursing in the last decades have received a total of 55.6k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Nursing usually cover General Health Professions (1.9k papers), Surgery (1.3k papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (612 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (512 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (393 papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Nursing are George Castledine, Mike Nolan, John Tingle, Aru Narayanasamy, Alan Glasper, Patricia Cronin, Michael Coughlan, Frances Ryan, Ian Peate and John R. Cutcliffe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Nursing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Nursing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Nursing.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Nursing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Nursing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Nursing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Nursing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025