Ruth Risiott

478 total citations
9 papers, 361 citations indexed

About

Ruth Risiott is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Risiott has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 361 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in Ruth Risiott's work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (2 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (2 papers). Ruth Risiott is often cited by papers focused on Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (2 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (2 papers). Ruth Risiott collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Ruth Risiott's co-authors include Sheila Maddock, Vicki Lancaster, J. F. Franklin, P. J. W. Lutman, M. G. K. Jones, S. W. J. Bright, A. Karp, Roger M. Wallsgrove, Peter R. Shewry and S. Parmar and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Botany, Plant Molecular Biology and Plant Science.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Risiott

9 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Risiott United Kingdom 9 326 273 73 36 26 9 361
Kurt Zoglauer Germany 12 304 0.9× 303 1.1× 19 0.3× 28 0.8× 7 0.3× 19 350
Charlotte H. Hänisch ten Cate Netherlands 12 331 1.0× 270 1.0× 12 0.2× 78 2.2× 21 0.8× 14 387
P. Jayakumar Canada 6 348 1.1× 94 0.3× 29 0.4× 19 0.5× 10 0.4× 11 376
Terese Richardson Australia 11 699 2.1× 311 1.1× 66 0.9× 41 1.1× 15 0.6× 12 744
T. H. D. Ho United States 7 330 1.0× 187 0.7× 12 0.2× 44 1.2× 8 0.3× 8 373
Averil Chlyah Morocco 9 269 0.8× 285 1.0× 11 0.2× 32 0.9× 10 0.4× 18 318
Zahra Agharbaoui Canada 11 368 1.1× 239 0.9× 44 0.6× 24 0.7× 6 0.2× 11 412
K. M. Ho Canada 10 312 1.0× 89 0.3× 43 0.6× 7 0.2× 10 0.4× 27 346
Martin M. Meyer United States 12 266 0.8× 229 0.8× 10 0.1× 18 0.5× 11 0.4× 25 310
I. T. Jones United Kingdom 12 399 1.2× 56 0.2× 35 0.5× 14 0.4× 15 0.6× 18 419

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Risiott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Risiott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Risiott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Risiott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Risiott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Risiott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Risiott. The network helps show where Ruth Risiott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Risiott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Risiott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Risiott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Risiott. Ruth Risiott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Lutman, P. J. W., et al.. (1996). Investigations into Alternative Methods to Predict the Competitive Effects of Weeds on Crop Yields. Weed Science. 44(2). 290–297. 30 indexed citations
2.
Lutman, P. J. W., et al.. (1994). The response of four spring‐sown combinable arable crops to weed competition. Weed Research. 34(2). 137–146. 39 indexed citations
4.
Ooms, G., Ruth Risiott, Alan C. Kendall, et al.. (1991). Phenotypic changes in T-cyt-transformed potato plants are consistent with enhanced sensitivity of specific cell types to normal regulation by root-derived cytokinin. Plant Molecular Biology. 17(4). 727–743. 11 indexed citations
5.
Wallsgrove, Roger M., Ruth Risiott, Ioan Negrutiu, & S. W. J. Bright. (1986). Biochemical characterisation of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia auxotrophs that require branched-chain amino acids. Plant Cell Reports. 5(3). 223–226. 8 indexed citations
6.
Wallsgrove, Roger M., Ruth Risiott, John King, & S. W. J. Bright. (1986). Biochemical characterisation of an auxotroph of Datura Innoxia requiring isoleucine and valine. Plant Science. 43(2). 109–114. 11 indexed citations
7.
Maddock, Sheila, Ruth Risiott, S. Parmar, M. G. K. Jones, & Peter R. Shewry. (1985). Somaclonal Variation in the Gliadin Patterns of Grains of Regenerated Wheat Plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 36(12). 1976–1984. 21 indexed citations
8.
Karp, A., Ruth Risiott, M. G. K. Jones, & S. W. J. Bright. (1984). Chromosome doubling in monohaploid and dihaploid potatoes by regeneration from cultured leaf explants. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 3(4). 363–373. 58 indexed citations
9.
Maddock, Sheila, Vicki Lancaster, Ruth Risiott, & J. F. Franklin. (1983). Plant Regeneration from Cultured Immature Embryos and Inflorescences of 25 Cultivars of Wheat (Triticum aestivum). Journal of Experimental Botany. 34(7). 915–926. 174 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026