This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Weed Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Weed Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Weed Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Weed Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Weed Research.
About Weed Research
The 3.2k papers published in Weed Research in the last decades have received a total of 70.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Weed Research usually cover Plant Science (2.7k papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (699 papers), Pollution (723 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (644 papers) and Insect Science (395 papers) specifically the topics of Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (1.8k papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (719 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (718 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (627 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (359 papers), Plant and animal studies (343 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (333 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (332 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Weed Research are H. A. Roberts, J. C. Streibig, Paolo Bàrberi, Roger Cousens, M.J. Kropff, A. Grundy, Allan Walker, Svend Christensen, E. J. P. Marshall and Paul Neve.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.