Ruth Mayer

502 citations
28 papers · 117 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Mayer

16 papers receiving 76 citations

Peers

Ruth Mayer
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Literature and Literary Theory 31
  • Cultural Studies 20
  • Geography, Planning and Development 11
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 9
  • Anthropology 17
Replace Elaine Hadley with:
Elaine Hadley United States
Crystal Bartolovich United States
Beth Fowkes Tobin United States
Dominique Kalifa France
Nicola Miller United Kingdom
Stephanie Smallwood United States
Nicola J. Watson United Kingdom
Lúcia Nagib United Kingdom
B. Venkat Mani United States
Margo Hendricks United States
Ruth Mayer relative to Elaine Hadley United States Elaine Hadley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Elaine Hadley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Mayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Mayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Mayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Mayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Mayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Mayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Mayer. The network helps show where Ruth Mayer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Mayer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Mayer Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Mayer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Artificial Africas: Colonial Images in the Times of Globalization
200239
2
"Africa As an Alien Future": The Middle Passage, Afrofuturism, and Postcolonial Waterworlds
201613
3 200710
4 20059
5 20188
6 20084
7 20044
8 20124
9
Trans-Pacific interactions : the United States and China, 1880-1950
20093
10 20163
11 20163
12
Grenzgänger Serielle Figuren im Medienwechsel
20123
13 20132
14 20052
15 20092
16 20122
17 20201
18
Globalkolorit : Multikulturalismus und Populärkultur
19981
19 20221
20 20121

About Ruth Mayer

Ruth Mayer is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Cultural Studies and Anthropology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 117 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (5 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (3 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers) and Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (31 citations), Cultural Studies (20 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (11 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (9 citations) and Anthropology (17 citations). Ruth Mayer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shane Denson, Mark Terkessidis and Dean Itsuji Saranillio. Their work appears in journals such as Modernism/modernity, Screen, New Literary History, Journal of Narrative Theory and Cultural Critique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact