Ruth M. Warwick

2.0k total citations
56 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Ruth M. Warwick is a scholar working on Hematology, Physiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth M. Warwick has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Hematology, 13 papers in Physiology and 11 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Ruth M. Warwick's work include Blood groups and transfusion (11 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (8 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (8 papers). Ruth M. Warwick is often cited by papers focused on Blood groups and transfusion (11 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (8 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (8 papers). Ruth M. Warwick collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Nigeria and United States. Ruth M. Warwick's co-authors include Janet I. Vaughan, Elizabeth A. Letsky, Nicholas M. Fisk, Phillip R. Bennett, Neil A Murray, Jean‐Pierre Cartron, Baya Chérif‐Zahar, Yves Colin, Caroline Le Van Kim and Cristina Navarrete and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Blood and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Ruth M. Warwick

54 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth M. Warwick United Kingdom 19 831 379 361 259 253 56 1.2k
A. Ludomirsky United States 9 603 0.7× 259 0.7× 728 2.0× 213 0.8× 361 1.4× 14 1.2k
C. Vermylen Belgium 18 741 0.9× 117 0.3× 381 1.1× 707 2.7× 168 0.7× 56 1.4k
Laura Detti United States 19 674 0.8× 260 0.7× 1.2k 3.3× 230 0.9× 449 1.8× 80 2.0k
William Reed United States 20 374 0.5× 71 0.2× 304 0.8× 259 1.0× 103 0.4× 41 977
P Polchi Italy 21 1.1k 1.3× 75 0.2× 420 1.2× 932 3.6× 217 0.9× 72 1.6k
A.H. Filipovich United States 23 1.2k 1.5× 63 0.2× 119 0.3× 281 1.1× 243 1.0× 47 2.0k
J. Ritter Germany 19 388 0.5× 175 0.5× 85 0.2× 84 0.3× 262 1.0× 39 1.1k
Shakila P. Khan United States 16 664 0.8× 75 0.2× 96 0.3× 116 0.4× 160 0.6× 55 997
Shelly L. Carter United States 20 1.6k 1.9× 71 0.2× 204 0.6× 441 1.7× 392 1.5× 30 2.3k
Yoshiko Hashii Japan 19 489 0.6× 69 0.2× 204 0.6× 112 0.4× 82 0.3× 127 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth M. Warwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth M. Warwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth M. Warwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth M. Warwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth M. Warwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth M. Warwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth M. Warwick. The network helps show where Ruth M. Warwick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth M. Warwick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth M. Warwick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth M. Warwick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth M. Warwick. Ruth M. Warwick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Beele, Hilde, et al.. (2014). Report of the clinical donor case workshop of the European Association of Tissue Banks Annual Congress 2013. Cell and Tissue Banking. 16(3). 449–455. 2 indexed citations
2.
Flack, Mal, et al.. (2012). Embedded academic language and learning support via an e-learning tool. CDU eSpace Institutional Repository (Charles Darwin University). 6(3). 1 indexed citations
3.
Fehily, Deirdre, Ted Eastlund, Hilde Beele, et al.. (2011). Results of the clinical donor case and quality system case workshops of the European Association of Tissue Banks annual meeting 2009. Cell and Tissue Banking. 13(1). 191–202. 5 indexed citations
4.
Jones, Mark, et al.. (2010). A review of allograft ophthalmic tissue in eye surgery. Cell and Tissue Banking. 11(1). 29–38. 11 indexed citations
5.
Saegeman, Veroniek, Akila Chandrasekar, Hilde Beele, et al.. (2009). EATB Donor Case Workshop 2007. Cell and Tissue Banking. 10(4). 351–357. 4 indexed citations
6.
Saw, Valerie, Angela M. Minassian, John Dart, et al.. (2007). Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular disease: a review of the first 233 cases from the UK user group. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 91(8). 1042–1047. 33 indexed citations
7.
Warwick, Ruth M., et al.. (2006). Donor Exclusion in the National Blood Service Tissue Services Living Bone Donor Programme. Cell and Tissue Banking. 7(1). 11–21. 6 indexed citations
8.
McDermott, Ian, et al.. (2005). Soft tissue allografts in the knee: A survey of UK usage and a report of a combined user/provider collaborative group. The Knee. 13(1). 72–75. 2 indexed citations
9.
Padley, David, Morag Ferguson, Ruth M. Warwick, et al.. (2005). Challenges in the Testing of Non-Heart-Beating Cadavers for Viral Markers: Implications for the Safety of Tissue Donors. Cell and Tissue Banking. 6(3). 171–179. 18 indexed citations
10.
Stanworth, Simon, et al.. (2001). An international survey of unrelated umbilical cord blood banking. Vox Sanguinis. 80(4). 236–243. 29 indexed citations
11.
Stanworth, Simon, Ruth M. Warwick, Michael A. J. Ferguson, & J. A. J. Barbara. (2000). A UK Survey of Virological Testing of Cadaver Tissue Donors. Vox Sanguinis. 79(4). 227–230. 17 indexed citations
12.
Wusteman, Monica C., D.E. Pegg, & Ruth M. Warwick. (2000). The Banking of Arterial Allografts in the United Kingdom. A Technical and Clinical Review. Cell and Tissue Banking. 1(4). 295–301. 23 indexed citations
13.
Armitage, S, et al.. (1999). Cord blood banking in London: the first 1000 collections. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 24(2). 139–145. 63 indexed citations
14.
Lee, Soohee, et al.. (1996). Prenatal diagnosis of Kell blood group genotypes: KEL1 and KEL2. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 175(2). 455–459. 24 indexed citations
15.
Warwick, Ruth M. & Neena Modi. (1995). Guidelines for the administration of blood products.. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 72(5). 379–381. 15 indexed citations
16.
Warwick, Ruth M., et al.. (1995). Clinical and laboratory aspects of TA-GVHD with reference to perinatal patients and gamma-irradiated red cell components. Transfusion Science. 16(2). 115–119. 4 indexed citations
17.
Warwick, Ruth M., et al.. (1994). In vitro culture of colony forming unit‐megakaryocyte (CFU‐MK) in fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. British Journal of Haematology. 88(4). 874–877. 25 indexed citations
18.
Fisk, Nicholas M., Phillip R. Bennett, Ruth M. Warwick, et al.. (1994). Clinical utility of fetal RhD typing in alloimmunized pregnancies by means of polymerase chain reaction on amniocytes or chorionic villi. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 171(1). 50–54. 28 indexed citations
19.
Warwick, Ruth M., et al.. (1980). Prolonged incubation period of imported P. vivax malaria in London.. PubMed. 73(5). 333–6. 7 indexed citations
20.
Warwick, Ruth M., A. H. Goldstone, & George Janossy. (1976). Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia uncovered by successful treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia.. BMJ. 2(6044). 1111–1112. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026