Jane E. Pearson
Impact in
- Pharmaceutical Science top 2%
- Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
- Biomaterials top 5%
- biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Papers in ⓘ
-
- biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties 3
- Surgery 2
- Surgical Sutures and Adhesives 1
- Co-authors
- H.V. Maulding (6 shared papers)J. W. Fong (5 shared papers)G. J. Argentieri (3 shared papers)G. E. Visscher (3 shared papers)R. L. Robison (3 shared papers)Donald R. Cowsar (1 shared paper)Thomas R. Tice (1 shared paper)Arnd Michaelis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research (3 papers)Journal of Controlled Release (2 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (1 paper)Cell and Tissue Banking (2 papers)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane E. Pearson
9 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Pharmaceutical Science 205
- Biomaterials 203
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films 19
- Molecular Medicine 10
- Biomedical Engineering 87
Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Pearson. The network helps show where Jane E. Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 182 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 86 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 57 | |
| 5 | 1986 | 49 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 9 | Deteriorating neurologic function in a 28-year-old renal transplant recipient. | 1985 | 3 |
About Jane E. Pearson
Jane E. Pearson is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Surgery, Neurology, Pharmaceutical Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (3 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (2 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (1 paper), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper), Oral and gingival health research (1 paper), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (1 paper) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (205 citations), Biomaterials (203 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (19 citations), Molecular Medicine (10 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (87 citations). Jane E. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include H.V. Maulding, J. W. Fong, G. J. Argentieri, G. E. Visscher, R. L. Robison, Donald R. Cowsar, Thomas R. Tice, Arnd Michaelis, Neil Gray and Christopher J. Womack. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Journal of Controlled Release, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cell and Tissue Banking and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.