Jane E. Pearson

583 total citations
9 papers, 479 citations indexed

About

Jane E. Pearson is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Surgery and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane E. Pearson has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 479 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Biomaterials, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Jane E. Pearson's work include biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (3 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (2 papers) and Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers). Jane E. Pearson is often cited by papers focused on biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (3 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (2 papers) and Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers). Jane E. Pearson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Jane E. Pearson's co-authors include H.V. Maulding, J. W. Fong, G. E. Visscher, G. J. Argentieri, R. L. Robison, Donald R. Cowsar, Thomas R. Tice, Arnd Michaelis, Deirdre Fehily and Ruth M. Warwick and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Controlled Release, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

In The Last Decade

Jane E. Pearson

9 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane E. Pearson United Kingdom	7	205	203	91	87	65	9	479
J. W. Fong United States	7	205 1.0×	204 1.0×	127 1.4×	85 1.0×	63 1.0×	7	491
R. L. Robison United States	6	150 0.7×	143 0.7×	112 1.2×	89 1.0×	62 1.0×	12	508
Donald R. Cowsar United States	7	299 1.5×	249 1.2×	85 0.9×	55 0.6×	40 0.6×	12	597
Catherine Curdy Switzerland	12	230 1.1×	139 0.7×	59 0.6×	97 1.1×	40 0.6×	16	477
Yasuaki Ogawa Japan	16	469 2.3×	299 1.5×	266 2.9×	132 1.5×	74 1.1×	18	938
P Ferrara Italy	4	93 0.5×	206 1.0×	45 0.5×	118 1.4×	77 1.2×	6	484
N Nihant Belgium	9	309 1.5×	212 1.0×	105 1.2×	87 1.0×	36 0.6×	14	553
Einat Cohen-Sela Israel	6	157 0.8×	177 0.9×	127 1.4×	104 1.2×	40 0.6×	6	441
Sudhir S. Chakravarthi United States	3	244 1.2×	299 1.5×	156 1.7×	131 1.5×	29 0.4×	3	538
Sarah Skidmore United States	9	392 1.9×	315 1.6×	115 1.3×	150 1.7×	34 0.5×	19	713

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Pearson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Pearson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Pearson. The network helps show where Jane E. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane E. Pearson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane E. Pearson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane E. Pearson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane E. Pearson. Jane E. Pearson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Warwick, Ruth M., et al.. (2006). Donor Exclusion in the National Blood Service Tissue Services Living Bone Donor Programme. Cell and Tissue Banking. 7(1). 11–21. 6 indexed citations

Womack, Christopher J., Neil Gray, Jane E. Pearson, & Deirdre Fehily. (2001). Cadaveric Tissue Supply to the Commercial Sector For Research: Collaboration between NHS Pathology and NBS Tissue Services in the U.K., Extending the Options for Donors. Cell and Tissue Banking. 2(1). 51–55. 7 indexed citations

Visscher, G. E., Jane E. Pearson, J. W. Fong, et al.. (1988). Effect of particle size on the in vitro and in vivo degradation rates of poly(DL‐lactide‐co‐glycolide) microcapsules. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 22(8). 733–746. 57 indexed citations

Visscher, G. E., R. L. Robison, H.V. Maulding, et al.. (1986). Biodegradation of and tissue reaction to poly(DL‐lactide) microcapsules. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 20(5). 667–676. 64 indexed citations

Fong, J. W., et al.. (1986). Evaluation of biodegradable microspheres prepared by a solvent evaporation process using sodium oleate as emulsifier. Journal of Controlled Release. 3(1-4). 119–130. 49 indexed citations

Maulding, H.V., et al.. (1986). Biodegradable microcapsules: Acceleration of polymeric excipient hydrolytic rate by incorporation of a basic medicament. Journal of Controlled Release. 3(1-4). 103–117. 86 indexed citations

Garcia, José Huygens Parente, et al.. (1985). Deteriorating neurologic function in a 28-year-old renal transplant recipient.. PubMed. 22(2). 208–14. 3 indexed citations

Visscher, G. E., R. L. Robison, H.V. Maulding, et al.. (1985). Biodegradation of and tissue reaction to 50:50 poly(DL‐lactide‐co‐glycolide) microcapsules. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 19(3). 349–365. 182 indexed citations

Maulding, H.V., et al.. (1975). Practical Kinetics III: Benzodiazepine Hydrolysis. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 64(2). 278–284. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact