William Reed

51 total papers · 1.4k total citations
41 papers, 972 citations indexed

About

William Reed is a scholar working on Hematology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, William Reed has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 972 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Hematology, 19 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 13 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in William Reed's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (18 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (14 papers) and Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (8 papers). William Reed is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (18 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (14 papers) and Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (8 papers). William Reed collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. William Reed's co-authors include Michael P. Busch, Garth H. Utter, Elliott Vichinsky, Tzong‐Hae Lee, John T. Owings, Tzong‐Hae Lee, Daniel M. Chafets, Teresa Paglieroni, Paul V. Holland and Robert C. Gosselin and has published in prestigious journals such as Blood, Annals of Surgery and The Journal of Pediatrics.

In The Last Decade

William Reed

38 papers receiving 934 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William Reed 374 303 258 145 140 41 972
M. Contreras 551 1.5× 111 0.4× 170 0.7× 316 2.2× 87 0.6× 50 1.2k
Ruth M. Warwick 831 2.2× 362 1.2× 261 1.0× 49 0.3× 125 0.9× 56 1.2k
H. Hambley 447 1.2× 221 0.7× 84 0.3× 88 0.6× 143 1.0× 35 795
Alyssa Ziman 400 1.1× 58 0.2× 241 0.9× 452 3.1× 83 0.6× 67 1.2k
Vincent J. Freda 503 1.3× 300 1.0× 136 0.5× 40 0.3× 149 1.1× 43 892
Eduardo Muñiz‐Díaz 726 1.9× 44 0.1× 154 0.6× 182 1.3× 283 2.0× 62 1.1k
Caterina Giovanna Valentini 295 0.8× 107 0.4× 199 0.8× 33 0.2× 37 0.3× 63 1.1k
Lin Js 314 0.8× 34 0.1× 106 0.4× 96 0.7× 94 0.7× 57 825
J. G. Eernisse 595 1.6× 57 0.2× 84 0.3× 156 1.1× 144 1.0× 29 977
J. Ritter 388 1.0× 85 0.3× 83 0.3× 30 0.2× 50 0.4× 39 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by William Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Reed. The network helps show where William Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Reed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Reed. William Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026