Ruth Lowry

37 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Ruth Lowry
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Applied Psychology 76
  • Physiology 177
  • Transportation 42
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 25
  • Health 40
Replace Megan Kirk with:
Megan Kirk Canada
David McMinn United Kingdom
Dana L. Wolff‐Hughes United States
Priscila Missaki Nakamura Brazil
Markus J. Duncan Canada
Eva A. Jaarsma Netherlands
Gemma C. Ryde United Kingdom
Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard United States
Priscila Marconcin Portugal
Jodee A. Schaben United States
Ruth Lowry relative to Megan Kirk Canada Megan Kirk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Megan Kirk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Lowry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Lowry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Lowry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Lowry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Lowry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Lowry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Lowry. The network helps show where Ruth Lowry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Lowry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Lowry Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Lowry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201945
2 200839
3 201638
4 201737
5 200830
6 200826
7 200825
8 201023
9 202019
10 201116
11 201816
12 201816
13 201713
14 202211
15 201710
16 20209
17 20228
18
An exploratory study of specialist and generalist teachers: predicting self efficacy in delivering primary physical education
20127
19
Exploring intrinsic and extrinsic motivational differences according to choice of physical activity.
20046
20 20176

About Ruth Lowry

Ruth Lowry is a scholar working on Physiology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (16 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Children's Physical and Motor Development (4 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (4 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (76 citations), Physiology (177 citations), Transportation (42 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (25 citations) and Health (40 citations). Ruth Lowry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Nicolas Farina, Nanette Mutrie, Graham Baker, Annemarie Wright, Sube Banerjee, Norah M. Nelson, Laura Hughes, Marcus S. Smith, Stephen B. Draper and Steven Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, Scientific Reports, Aging & Mental Health and Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact