Ruth DeRosa

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Ruth DeRosa is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth DeRosa has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Ruth DeRosa's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper). Ruth DeRosa is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper). Ruth DeRosa collaborates with scholars based in United States. Ruth DeRosa's co-authors include Richard Kagan, Joseph Spinazzola, Julián D. Ford, Marylène Cloître, Erna Olafson, Cheryl Lanktree, Margaret E. Blaustein, Bessel van der Kolk, Lisa Amaya‐Jackson and Samantha Kaplan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Traumatic Stress, Behavior Therapy and American Journal of Orthopsychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Ruth DeRosa

8 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

Complex Trauma in Children and Adolescents 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth DeRosa United States 5 1.1k 266 226 183 147 8 1.2k
Richard Kagan United States 8 1.0k 1.0× 340 1.3× 231 1.0× 202 1.1× 115 0.8× 18 1.2k
Cheryl Lanktree United States 8 1.4k 1.3× 394 1.5× 282 1.2× 236 1.3× 185 1.3× 11 1.6k
Erna Olafson United States 12 1.4k 1.3× 336 1.3× 282 1.2× 280 1.5× 179 1.2× 19 1.6k
Melissa K. Runyon United States 15 932 0.9× 232 0.9× 157 0.7× 104 0.6× 131 0.9× 28 1.0k
Isabelle Daigneault Canada 21 1.0k 1.0× 256 1.0× 242 1.1× 193 1.1× 345 2.3× 58 1.3k
Ferol E. Mennen United States 19 995 0.9× 325 1.2× 239 1.1× 198 1.1× 221 1.5× 48 1.1k
Susan J. Ko United States 9 1.4k 1.3× 435 1.6× 453 2.0× 291 1.6× 103 0.7× 9 1.6k
Ineke Way United States 13 730 0.7× 172 0.6× 290 1.3× 197 1.1× 148 1.0× 17 868
Mark Genuis Canada 6 826 0.8× 171 0.6× 227 1.0× 177 1.0× 238 1.6× 8 961
Monica M. Fitzgerald United States 19 850 0.8× 141 0.5× 180 0.8× 193 1.1× 206 1.4× 24 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth DeRosa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth DeRosa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth DeRosa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth DeRosa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth DeRosa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth DeRosa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth DeRosa. The network helps show where Ruth DeRosa may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth DeRosa

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth DeRosa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth DeRosa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth DeRosa. Ruth DeRosa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Rathus, Jill H., et al.. (2015). Assumptions and Conclusions: Fundamental Distinctions Between Tibetan Buddhist and Western Approaches to Happiness. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 33(4). 341–367. 3 indexed citations
2.
DeRosa, Ruth, Lisa Amaya‐Jackson, & Christopher M. Layne. (2013). From rifts to riffs: Evidence-based principles to guide critical thinking about next-generation child trauma treatments and training.. Training and Education in Professional Psychology. 7(3). 195–204. 13 indexed citations
3.
Amaya‐Jackson, Lisa & Ruth DeRosa. (2007). Treatment considerations for clinicians in applying evidence‐based practice to complex presentations in child trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 20(4). 379–390. 42 indexed citations
4.
Spinazzola, Joseph, Julián D. Ford, Cheryl Lanktree, et al.. (2005). Complex Trauma in Children and Adolescents. Psychiatric Annals. 35(5). 390–398. 1044 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Krause, Elizabeth D., Ruth DeRosa, & Susan Roth. (2002). Gender, trauma themes, and PTSD: Narratives of male and female survivors.. 12 indexed citations
6.
Pelcovitz, David, Samantha Kaplan, Ruth DeRosa, Francine S. Mandel, & Suzanne Salzinger. (2000). Psychiatric disorders in adolescents exposed to domestic violence and physical abuse.. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 70(3). 360–369. 79 indexed citations
7.
DeRosa, Ruth, et al.. (1996). A Multi-Modal Treatment for Incest Survivors: Preliminary Outcome Data. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 3(3). 208–219. 3 indexed citations
8.
Craighead, Linda W., Heather N. Allen, W. Edward Craighead, & Ruth DeRosa. (1996). Effect of social feedback on learning rate and cognitive distortions among women with bulimia. Behavior Therapy. 27(4). 551–563. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026