Ruth Curson
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 2%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Ovarian function and disorders
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 9
- Ovarian function and disorders 2
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 7
- Co-authors
- K. DanielsEmma LycettSusan GolombokKen DanielsMarilyn CrawshawGillian LewisE. BlythJohn Parsons
- Journals
- Human Reproduction (3 papers)Fertility and Sterility (3 papers)Journal of Medical Ethics (1 paper)Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Ruth Curson
12 papers receiving 339 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Reproductive Medicine 341
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 243
- Demography 83
- Gender Studies 58
- Safety Research 29
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Curson
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Curson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Curson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Curson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Curson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Curson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Curson. The network helps show where Ruth Curson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Curson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring | 2005 | 11 |
| 2 | 2005 | 100 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 82 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 54 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 9 | |
| 12 | The outcome of pregnancy in previously infertile women. | 1978 | 5 |
| 13 | 1973 | 2 |
About Ruth Curson
Ruth Curson is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Demography and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (9 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (7 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (4 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (1 paper) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (341 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (243 citations), Demography (83 citations), Gender Studies (58 citations) and Safety Research (29 citations). Ruth Curson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include K. Daniels, Emma Lycett, Susan Golombok, Ken Daniels, Marilyn Crawshaw, Gillian Lewis, E. Blyth, John Parsons, Geeta Nargund and Awoniyi O. Awonuga. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Medical Ethics, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.